Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35207676›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Verification of De-Identification Techniques for Personal Information Using Tree-Based Methods with Shapley Values.

Junhak Lee, Jinwoo Jeong, Sungji Jung, Jihoon Moon, Seungmin Rho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Recent Advances in AI and GenAI for Health Informatics.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Junhak LeeDepartment of Industrial Security, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea.
Jinwoo JeongDepartment of Industrial Security, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea.
Sungji JungDepartment of Industrial Security, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea.
Jihoon MoonDepartment of Industrial Security, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9524-5729
Seungmin RhoDepartment of Industrial Security, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1936-6785

Funding

Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion 2021-2018-0-01799Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology P0008703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of big data and cloud computing technologies, the importance of pseudonym information has grown. However, the tools for verifying whether the de-identification methodology is correctly applied to ensure data confidentiality and usability are insufficient. This paper proposes a verification of de-identification techniques for personal healthcare information by considering data confidentiality and usability. Data are generated and preprocessed by considering the actual statistical data, personal information datasets, and de-identification datasets based on medical data to represent the de-identification technique as a numeric dataset. Five tree-based regression models (i.e., decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting machine, extreme gradient boosting, and light gradient boosting machine) are constructed using the de-identification dataset to effectively discover nonlinear relationships between dependent and independent variables in numerical datasets. Then, the most effective model is selected from personal information data in which pseudonym processing is essential for data utilization. The Shapley additive explanation, an explainable artificial intelligence technique, is applied to the most effective model to establish pseudonym processing policies and machine learning to present a machine-learning process that selects an appropriate de-identification methodology.

Indexed as

de-identificationexplainable artificial intelligencemachine learningmedical datatree-based method

Identifiers

PMID35207676
PMCPMC8877642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.