Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35207541›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Mutation Threshold for Cooperative Takeover.

Alexandre Champagne-Ruel, Paul Charbonneau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandre Champagne-RuelDépartement de Physique, Université de Montréal, QC H2V 0B3, 2900 Edouard Montpetit Blvd, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2699-2699
Paul CharbonneauDépartement de Physique, Université de Montréal, QC H2V 0B3, 2900 Edouard Montpetit Blvd, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1618-3924

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council RN000735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the leading theories for the origin of life includes the hypothesis according to which life would have evolved as cooperative networks of molecules. Explaining cooperation-and particularly, its emergence in favoring the evolution of life-bearing molecules-is thus a key element in describing the transition from nonlife to life. Using agent-based modeling of the iterated prisoner's dilemma, we investigate the emergence of cooperative behavior in a stochastic and spatially extended setting and characterize the effects of inheritance and variability. We demonstrate that there is a mutation threshold above which cooperation is-counterintuitively-selected, which drives a dramatic and robust cooperative takeover of the whole system sustained consistently up to the error catastrophe, in a manner reminiscent of typical phase transition phenomena in statistical physics. Moreover, our results also imply that one of the simplest conditional cooperative strategies, "Tit-for-Tat", plays a key role in the emergence of cooperative behavior required for the origin of life.

Indexed as

cooperationcritical phenomenaorigin of lifeprisoner’s dilemmastochasticitythresholds

Identifiers

PMID35207541
PMCPMC8874834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.