Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35207430›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Pediatric Headache in Primary Care and Emergency Departments: Consensus with RAND/UCLA Method.

Giovanni Prezioso, Agnese Suppiej, Valentina Alberghini, Patrizia Bergonzini, Maria Elena Capra, Ilaria Corsini, Alessandro De Fanti, Elisa Fiumana, Martina Fornaro, Lucia Marangio and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. When Pediatric Headaches Are Not Benign-Eye Findings.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Giovanni PreziosoClinic of Pediatrics, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Agnese SuppiejUnit of Pediatrics, Sant'Anna University Hospital, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5130-1450
Valentina AlberghiniUnit of Pediatrics, Maggiore Hospital, 40133 Bologna, Italy.
Patrizia BergonziniUnit of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy.
Maria Elena CapraUnit of Pediatrics and Neonatology, G. di Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.
Ilaria CorsiniEmergency Pediatrics, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Alessandro De FantiUnit of Pediatrics, IRCCS-AUSL Reggio Emilia, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Elisa FiumanaUnit of Pediatrics, Sant'Anna University Hospital, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
Martina FornaroUnit of Neonatology and Pediatrics, Macerata Hospital, 62100 Macerata, Italy.
Lucia MarangioUnit of Pediatrics, Forlì Hospital, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forlì, Italy.
Paolo RicciardelliUnit of Pediatrics, Ravenna Hospital, AUSL Romagna, 48100 Ravenna, Italy.
Laura SerraUnit of Pediatrics, AUSL Imola, 40026 Imola, Italy.
Duccio Maria CordelliUnit of Child Neuropsychiatry, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1367-6419
Susanna EspositoClinic of Pediatrics, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
The Emilia-Romagna Headache Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Headache is the most frequent neurological symptom in childhood and the main reason for admission to pediatric emergency departments. The aim of this consensus document is to define a shared clinical pathway between primary care pediatricians (PCP) and hospitals for the management of children presenting with headache. For the purposes of the study, a group of hospital pediatricians and a group of PCP from the Emilia Romagna's health districts were selected to achieve consensus using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Thirty-nine clinical scenarios were developed: for each scenario, participants were asked to rank the appropriateness of each option from 1 to 9. Agreement was reached if ≥75% of participants ranked within the same range of appropriateness. The answers, results, and discussion helped to define the appropriateness of procedures with a low level of evidence regarding different steps of the diagnostic-therapeutic process: primary care evaluation, emergency department evaluation, hospital admission, acute therapy, prophylaxis, and follow-up. The RAND proved to be a valid method to value appropriateness of procedures and define a diagnostic-therapeutic pathway suitable to the local reality in the management of pediatric headache. From our results, some useful recommendations were developed for optimizing the healthcare professionals' network among primary care services and hospitals.

Indexed as

acute therapyheadachemigrainepediatric headacheprophylaxisRAND/UCLA appropriateness methodred flags

Identifiers

PMID35207430
PMCPMC8877535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.