ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Controversies in Choledochal Malformation in Children: An International Survey among Pediatric Hepatobiliary Surgeons and Gastroenterologists.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical outcomes in neonates and infants with congenital choledochal malformation: analysis of the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Endoscopic bile duct stenting as preliminary treatment of complicated choledochal malformation before definitive surgery.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026Article
- Forme Fruste Choledochal Cysts in Children: Clinical Presentation and Treatment Outcomes-A Retrospective Multicenter Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Strengthening collaboration within Europe: biliary atresia and the rise of the European Reference Networks.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2025Review
- Lost in transition? Loss of follow-up and quality of life in adults after resection of choledochal malformation in childhood.Innovative surgical sciences · 2024Article
- Major surgical conditions of childhood and their lifelong implications: comprehensive review.BJS open · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile congenital choledochal malformation (CCM) is relatively well known within the pediatric surgical and pediatric gastroenterological communities, many controversies and questions remain.
methodsIn this paper, we will discuss the results of an international Delphi survey among members of the European Reference Network RARE-LIVER and of the faculty of the Biliary Atresia and Related Diseases (BARD) network to identify the most common practices as well as controversies regarding diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of this still enigmatic disease.
resultsTwenty-two individual respondents completed the survey. While there seems to be agreement on the definitions of CCM, preoperative workup, surgical approach and follow-up still vary considerably. The mainstay of treatment remains the removal of the entire extrahepatic biliary tract, clearance of debris both proximally and distally, followed by reconstruction with (according to 86% of respondents) a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Nonetheless, both laparoscopic and robotic-assisted resections are gaining ground with the suggestion that this might be facilitated by concentration of care and resources in specialized centers. However, long-term outcomes are still lacking.
conclusionsAs even post-surgical CCM has to be considered as having premalignant potential, follow-up should be well-organized and continued into adulthood. This seems to be lacking in many centers. International cooperation for both benchmarking and research is paramount to improving care for this rare disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.