Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35207421›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Controversies in Choledochal Malformation in Children: An International Survey among Pediatric Hepatobiliary Surgeons and Gastroenterologists.

Jan B F Hulscher, Joachim F Kuebler, Janneke M Bruggink, Mark Davenport, Stefan Scholz, Claus Petersen, Omid Madadi-Sanjani, Nagoud Schukfeh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Jan B F HulscherDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, 9800RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Joachim F KueblerEuropean Reference Network RARE-LIVER, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Janneke M BrugginkDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, 9800RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Mark DavenportDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Kings College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0938-2717
Stefan ScholzDivision of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8466-1700
Claus PetersenEuropean Reference Network RARE-LIVER, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1789-7163
Omid Madadi-SanjaniEuropean Reference Network RARE-LIVER, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7239-8973
Nagoud SchukfehEuropean Reference Network RARE-LIVER, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLKing's College Hospital · GBUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile congenital choledochal malformation (CCM) is relatively well known within the pediatric surgical and pediatric gastroenterological communities, many controversies and questions remain.

methodsIn this paper, we will discuss the results of an international Delphi survey among members of the European Reference Network RARE-LIVER and of the faculty of the Biliary Atresia and Related Diseases (BARD) network to identify the most common practices as well as controversies regarding diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of this still enigmatic disease.

resultsTwenty-two individual respondents completed the survey. While there seems to be agreement on the definitions of CCM, preoperative workup, surgical approach and follow-up still vary considerably. The mainstay of treatment remains the removal of the entire extrahepatic biliary tract, clearance of debris both proximally and distally, followed by reconstruction with (according to 86% of respondents) a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Nonetheless, both laparoscopic and robotic-assisted resections are gaining ground with the suggestion that this might be facilitated by concentration of care and resources in specialized centers. However, long-term outcomes are still lacking.

conclusionsAs even post-surgical CCM has to be considered as having premalignant potential, follow-up should be well-organized and continued into adulthood. This seems to be lacking in many centers. International cooperation for both benchmarking and research is paramount to improving care for this rare disease.

Indexed as

biliary atresiacholedochal malformationDelphi surveyhepaticojejunostomy

Identifiers

PMID35207421
PMCPMC8879848
OpenAlexW4213193807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.