Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35207359›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Need for Inclusive Consideration of Transgender and Gender Diverse People in E-Health Services: A Systematic Review.

Janis Renner, Lars Täuber, Timo O Nieder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Janis RennerUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institute for Sex Research, Sexual Medicine and Forensic Psychiatry, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1063-1626
Lars TäuberUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institute for Sex Research, Sexual Medicine and Forensic Psychiatry, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Timo O NiederUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institute for Sex Research, Sexual Medicine and Forensic Psychiatry, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3052-5169

Funding

Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss 01NVF17051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people use the internet to find ways out of isolation, network, and share information on health-related topics. Thus, e-health services could reduce the health burden of TGD people and facilitate access to health care. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review on e-health approaches that could improve trans health care (i.e., services directly for TGD people or training programs for health care professionals, HCPs) and their effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and PubPsych databases for publications from January 2000 to June 2021 with final updates before publication. The systematic review identified e-health services across 27 studies from 8 different countries. Few studies evaluated e-health services exclusively for TGD people. However, use of an e-health service was found to be effective and beneficial: TGD people improved in health-related outcomes, and HCPs improved in professional expertise. Service users find e-health services helpful and easy to integrate into their daily lives. Recommendations for further development of e-health services in trans health care are provided. In the future, given the rapidly evolving e-health research and care field, new treatment approaches for TGD people should be subject to ongoing evaluation and development.

Indexed as

digital healthe-healthgender diverseLGBTsystematic reviewtransgendertrans health care

Identifiers

PMID35207359
PMCPMC8880545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.