Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35207332›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Prevalence of Ocular Anomalies in Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Parinaz Rostamzad, Zehra F Arslan, Irene M J Mathijssen, Maarten J Koudstaal, Mieke M Pleumeekers, Sarah L Versnel, Sjoukje E Loudon

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Distraction in anterior plagiocephaly: technique, risks, and long-term results.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Two-Year Progressive Cranial Changes Following the Melbourne Technique for Sagittal Craniosynostosis.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Strabismus in Genetic Syndromes: A Review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Parinaz RostamzadDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3539-2716
Zehra F ArslanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Irene M J MathijssenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten J KoudstaalDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mieke M PleumeekersDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sarah L VersnelDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sjoukje E LoudonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

Rotterdamse Stichting Blindenbelangen HV/AB/ B20210035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to describe the ophthalmic abnormalities and their prevalence in craniosynostosis prior to craniofacial surgery.

methodsA systematic search was conducted on Medline OVID, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Web of Science Core Collection. Inclusion criteria were English papers, children aged <18 years with non-syndromic and syndromic craniosynostosis, case reports, case series, and case-control studies. A system of domains was established consisting of an anatomic and functional ophthalmic domain. A meta-analysis of single proportions was carried out using random effects model and pooled mean proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

resultsThirty-two papers analyzing 2027 patients were included. Strabismus was the most common anomaly in non-syndromic craniosynostosis: Horizontal strabismus was highest prevalent in unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS) 19% (95% CI 9-32), followed by vertical strabismus 17% (95% CI 5-33). In syndromic craniosynostosis, horizontal strabismus was most prevalent in Crouzon syndrome 52% (95 CI 26-76), followed by Apert syndrome 50% (95% CI 42-58). Vertical strabismus was most prevalent in Saethre-Chotzen 60% followed by Muenke's syndrome 36%. Furthermore, astigmatism was the second most reported outcome in non-syndromic craniosynostosis and highest prevalent in UCS 35% (95% CI 21-51). In syndromic craniosynostosis, astigmatism was most frequently seen in Crouzon syndrome 43% (95% CI 22-65), followed by Apert syndrome 34% (95% CI 14-58). Moreover, in syndromic craniosynostosis, 5-40% had a decrease in visual acuity (VA) ≤ 0.3 LogMAR in the better eye and 11-65% had a VA ≤ 0.3 LogMAR in at least one eye. DISCUSSION: This review demonstrates the high prevalence of ocular anomalies in non-syndromic and syndromic craniosynostosis. A multidisciplinary and systematic approach is needed for the screening and optimal treatment of these conditions in a timely manner.

Indexed as

craniofacial disordersnon-syndromic craniosynostosisocular anomaliesorbital malformationssyndromic craniosynostosis

Identifiers

PMID35207332
PMCPMC8877705
OpenAlexW4214552111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.