Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35207316›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Liquid Biopsy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Management: Building Specific Biosignatures via Machine Learning.

Makrina Karaglani, Maria Panagopoulou, Christina Cheimonidi, Ioannis Tsamardinos, Efstratios Maltezos, Nikolaos Papanas, Dimitrios Papazoglou, George Mastorakos, Ekaterini Chatzaki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Liquid Biopsy: A Game Changer for Type 2 Diabetes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Makrina KaraglaniLaboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Maria PanagopoulouLaboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Christina CheimonidiLaboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0761-0648
Ioannis TsamardinosJADBio Gnosis DA, Science and Technology Park of Crete, 71500 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-2492-959X
Efstratios MaltezosDiabetes Centre, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Nikolaos PapanasDiabetes Centre, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7320-785X
Dimitrios PapazoglouDiabetes Centre, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
George MastorakosEndocrine Unit, 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Aretaieion" University Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-1929-3275
Ekaterini ChatzakiLaboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5832-4257
Democritus University of Thrace · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRScience and Technology Park of Crete · GR

Funding

RESEARCH - CREATE - INNOVATE T1EDK-00940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe need for minimally invasive biomarkers for the early diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) prior to the clinical onset and monitoring of β-pancreatic cell loss is emerging. Here, we focused on studying circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) as a liquid biopsy biomaterial for accurate diagnosis/monitoring of T2DM.

methodsccfDNA levels were directly quantified in sera from 96 T2DM patients and 71 healthy individuals via fluorometry, and then fragment DNA size profiling was performed by capillary electrophoresis. Following this, ccfDNA methylation levels of five β-cell-related genes were measured via qPCR. Data were analyzed by automated machine learning to build classifying predictive models.

resultsccfDNA levels were found to be similar between groups but indicative of apoptosis in T2DM.

conclusionsOur data unravel the value of ccfDNA as a minimally invasive biomaterial carrying important clinical information for T2DM. Upon prospective clinical evaluation, the built biosignature can be disruptive for T2DM clinical management.

Indexed as

circulating cell free DNADNA methylationmachine learningtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID35207316
PMCPMC8876363
OpenAlexW4212879471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.