Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35207226›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Paraaortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecologic Oncology-Significance of Vessels Variations.

Stoyan Kostov, Ilker Selçuk, Angel Yordanov, Yavor Kornovski, Hakan Yalçın, Stanislav Slavchev, Yonka Ivanova, Svetla Dineva, Deyan Dzhenkov, Rafał Watrowski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Stoyan KostovDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital "Saint Anna", Medical University of Varna, 9002 Varna, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-5279-3095
Ilker SelçukDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Woman's Health Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara 06230, Turkey.
Angel YordanovDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-7719-382X
Yavor KornovskiDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital "Saint Anna", Medical University of Varna, 9002 Varna, Bulgaria.
Hakan YalçınDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Woman's Health Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara 06230, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9027-1351
Stanislav SlavchevDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital "Saint Anna", Medical University of Varna, 9002 Varna, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0003-4830-6159
Yonka IvanovaDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital "Saint Anna", Medical University of Varna, 9002 Varna, Bulgaria.
Svetla DinevaDiagnostic Imaging Department, Medical University of Sofia, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-5163-4631
Deyan DzhenkovDepartment of General and Clinical Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Deontology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University-Varna "Prof. Dr. Paraskev Stoyanov", 9002 Varna, Bulgaria.
Rafał WatrowskiFaculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6828-1887
Medical University of Varna · BGMinistry of Health · TRMedical University of Sofia · BGMedical University Pleven · BGUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymphadenectomy has been an essential part of the surgical treatment in surgical oncology, as the lymphatic channels and nodes are the main dissemination pathway for most of the gynecological cancers. Pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy are frequent surgical procedures in gynecologic oncology. Paraaortic lymph node dissection facilitates staging, prognosis, surgical and postoperative management of patients. It is one of the most challenging retroperitoneal surgeries. A comprehensive knowledge of the paraaortic region is mandatory. Intraoperative bleeding is the most common complication during lymphadenectomy due to direct vascular injury, poor tissue handling, exuberant retraction and possible anatomical variations of the vessels in the paraaortic region. Approximately, one-third of women will have at least one anatomic variation in the paraaortic region. It must be stressed that anomalous vessels may be encountered in every woman who will undergo surgery. Consequently, detailed knowledge of anatomical vessels variations is required in order to prevent iatrogenic vessel injury. The importance of these variations is well described in urology, vascular and general surgery. Conversely, in oncogynecological surgery, there are few articles, which described some of the vessels variations in the paraaortic region. The present article aims to propose a surgical classification and to describe the majority of vessels variation, which could be encountered during paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology. Moreover, surgical considerations in order to prevent anomalous vessels injury are well described.

Indexed as

paraaortic lymph node dissectionsurgical classificationvessels variations

Identifiers

PMID35207226
PMCPMC8879527
OpenAlexW4212790158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.