Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35207222›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Update on Efficacy of Conservative Treatments for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Teemu Karjalanen, Saara Raatikainen, Kati Jaatinen, Vieda Lusa

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07233343 (Effect of Fascial Mobilization Therapy on Pain, Grip Strength and Manual Dexterity in Patients With Postpartum Carpal Tunnel Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07233343 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Fascial Mobilization Therapy on Pain, Grip Strength and Manual Dexterity in Patients With Postpartum Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorHasan Kalyoncu UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsCarpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Fascial Mobilization, Post PartumArmsConventional physiotherapy, Fascial mobilization therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: As Seen from the Perspective of the Patient.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Teemu KarjalanenDepartment of Hand and Micosurgery, Tampere University Hospital, 33521 Tampere, Finland.
Saara RaatikainenMusculoskeletal and Plastic Surgery Department, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland.
Kati JaatinenCentral Finland Healthcare District, 40620 Jyväskylä, Finland.
Vieda LusaCentral Finland Healthcare District, 40620 Jyväskylä, Finland.
Central Finland Health Care District · FITampere University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common upper extremity compression neuropathy. Non-operative interventions are usually the first-line treatments, and surgery is reserved for those that do not achieve a satisfactory symptom state by non-operative means. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence regarding the efficacy of orthoses, corticosteroid injections, platelet-rich plasma injections, Kinesio taping, neurodynamic techniques, gabapentin, therapeutic ultrasound, and extracorporeal shockwave therapy in people with CTS. While many trials suggest small short-term benefits, rigorous evidence of long-term patient-important benefits is limited. To improve the utility of healthcare resources, research in this area should focus on establishing efficacy of each treatment instead of comparing various treatments with uncertain benefits.

Indexed as

carpal tunnel syndromecorticosteroidESWTgabapentinKinesio tapingneurodynamic techniquesorthosesplatelet-rich plasmasplintultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35207222
PMCPMC8877380
OpenAlexW4213303192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.