ReviewMembranes2022
New Horizons in Structural Biology of Membrane Proteins: Experimental Evaluation of the Role of Conformational Dynamics and Intrinsic Flexibility.
Review in Membranes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Conformational Flexibility of Transmembrane Helices: How it Works and Where it Matters.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- A robust and scalable immunoadsorbent platform based on the high-affinity M03-IgG antibody for targeted IL-6 Removal in cytokine storm.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Loss-of-function variant of SLC30A8 rs13266634 (C > T) protects against type 2 diabetes by stabilizing ZnT8: Insights from epidemiological and computational analyses.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Molecular dynamics simulations of biological membranes and membrane-associated phenomena across scales.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025Review
- A Tiny Viral Protein, SARS-CoV-2-ORF7b: Functional Molecular Mechanisms.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Computational drug development for membrane protein targets.Nature biotechnology · 2024Review
- Solution NMR investigations of integral membrane proteins: Challenges and innovations.Current opinion in structural biology · 2023Review
- Fundamentals of HDX-MS.Essays in biochemistry · 2023Review
- Structure-Based Function and Regulation of NCX Variants: Updates and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A plethora of membrane proteins are found along the cell surface and on the convoluted labyrinth of membranes surrounding organelles. Since the advent of various structural biology techniques, a sub-population of these proteins has become accessible to investigation at near-atomic resolutions. The predominant bona fide methods for structure solution, X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM, provide high resolution in three-dimensional space at the cost of neglecting protein motions through time. Though structures provide various rigid snapshots, only an amorphous mechanistic understanding can be inferred from interpolations between these different static states. In this review, we discuss various techniques that have been utilized in observing dynamic conformational intermediaries that remain elusive from rigid structures. More specifically we discuss the application of structural techniques such as NMR, cryo-EM and X-ray crystallography in studying protein dynamics along with complementation by conformational trapping by specific binders such as antibodies. We finally showcase the strength of various biophysical techniques including FRET, EPR and computational approaches using a multitude of succinct examples from GPCRs, transporters and ion channels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.