Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35207012›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Workshop on Blood Loss Quantification in Obstetrics: Improving Medical Student Learning through Clinical Simulation.

Javier Ruiz-Labarta, Ana Martínez Martín, Pilar Pintado Recarte, Blanca González Garzón, Juan Manuel Pina Moreno, Mercedes Sánchez Rodríguez, África Vallejo Gea, Luis Sordo, Melchor Álvarez-Mon, Miguel A Ortega and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Javier Ruiz-LabartaDepartment of Public and Maternal and Child Health, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7769-7086
Ana Martínez MartínDepartment of Public and Maternal and Child Health, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Pilar Pintado RecarteDepartment of Public and Maternal and Child Health, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Blanca González GarzónDepartment of Public and Maternal and Child Health, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Juan Manuel Pina MorenoDepartment of Public and Maternal and Child Health, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Mercedes Sánchez RodríguezDepartment of Public and Maternal and Child Health, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
África Vallejo GeaDepartment of Public and Maternal and Child Health, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Luis SordoDepartment of Public and Maternal and Child Health, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1760-9472
Melchor Álvarez-MonDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28801 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1309-7510
Miguel A OrtegaDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28801 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2588-1708
Coral Bravo ArribasDepartment of Public and Maternal and Child Health, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Juan A De León-LuisDepartment of Public and Maternal and Child Health, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6320-2668

Funding

Comunidad de Madrid B2020/MITICAD-CM
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess whether a clinical simulation-based obstetric blood loss quantification workshop for medical undergraduate trainees improves theoretical-practical knowledge, along with self-assurance and self-confidence.

methodsThis was a quasi-experimental pre-post learning study conducted at the Gynaecology and Obstetrics Unit of the Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. Participants were volunteer students in their fourth year of a 6-year degree course in Medicine. The study period was divided into the stages: pre-workshop, intra-workshop, 2 weeks post-workshop and 6 months post-workshop. In the pre-workshop stage, students completed a brief online course in preparation for the workshop. The effectiveness of the workshop was assessed through multiple choice tests and self-administered questionnaires. Data were compared between time-points using statistical tests for paired samples.

resultsOf the 142 students invited (age 21.94 ± 3.12 years), 138 accepted the offer of the workshop (97.2%), and 85.4% had no experience in managing blood loss. Between the stages pre- and 2 weeks post-workshop, significant improvements were observed in theoretical-practical knowledge (μ = 1.109), self-assurance and self-confidence. At the 6 months post-workshop stage, theoretical-practical knowledge diminished compared with 2 weeks post-workshop, returning to pre-workshop levels, while self-assurance and confidence failed to vary significantly in the longer term.

conclusionsThe obstetric workshop improved theoretical-practical knowledge and the self-assurance and confidence of the medical students. Results 2 weeks post-workshop were maintained up until 6 months after the training intervention. The clinical simulation-based workshop was perceived by the students as useful and necessary.

Indexed as

blood loss quantificationclinical simulationfeedbackknowledgeobstetric haemorrhageself-assuranceself-confidenceusefulness

Identifiers

PMID35207012
PMCPMC8871682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.