Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35206954›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Cleaning and Disinfection Protocols for Clear Orthodontic Aligners: A Systematic Review.

Carole Charavet, Zoé Gourdain, Léa Graveline, Laurence Lupi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07610603 (Bacterial Biofilm Evaluation of Four Methods for Cleaning Clear Aligners Using SEM), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07610603 nacompletednot on this map

Bacterial Biofilm Evaluation of Four Methods for Cleaning Clear Aligners Using SEM: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiyadh Elm UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsOrthodontic Appliances, Removable, Dental Plaque, Biofilms, DisinfectionArmsToothbrushing of clear aligner with water, Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% oral rinse, Effervescent aligner cleaning tablet, Household ultrasonic cleaner with effervescent cleaning tablet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carole CharavetUniversité Côte d'Azur, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Département d'Orthodontie, 06800 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1624-4205
Zoé GourdainCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Pôle Odontologie, 06000 Nice, France.
Léa GravelineCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Pôle Odontologie, 06000 Nice, France.
Laurence LupiCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Pôle Odontologie, 06000 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7817-7186

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Clear orthodontic aligners support the development of oral biofilms, which could lead to interferences with the oral microbiota already existing and the deterioration of oral health, with the development of dental caries, periodontal disease and even systemic infections. Therefore, preventive oral health care requires a cleaning and disinfection procedure for aligners. (2) Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted across four databases following the PRISMA guidelines up to May 2021, combining an electronic and a manual search. Prospective studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), crossover studies (COSs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs), published in the English language without time restrictions, evaluating the efficacy of cleaning and disinfection protocols for clear orthodontic aligners by comparing them with a placebo or a negative control, were included. The article selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed by two independent blinded review authors. In case of disagreement, a third author was solicited throughout the selection process. (3) Results: Among the 221 articles screened in the search process, 4 studies were included in the review, all designed as crossover studies (single arm without randomization with the same sequence of different cleaning and disinfection protocols for each participant). Different cleaning and disinfection methods were studied such as mechanical methods (brushing with toothpaste or vibration), chemical methods/pharmaceutical products (chlorhexidine antibacterial substance, anionic or cationic detergents or effervescent tablets) or combinations of both. (4) Conclusion: Although the determination of the most remarkable method of cleaning and disinfection was impossible because no direct comparison was conducted between all these methods, a multi-step protocol, including the combination of a mechanical and a chemical method, seems to be the most effective approach. Further research is needed to define the most preventive oral health care protocol. Registration: PROSPERO CRD 42021278498.

Indexed as

alignersbiofilmcleaning protocolsdisinfection protocolsoral health careorthodontic aligners

Identifiers

PMID35206954
PMCPMC8871989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.