Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35206940›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Professional Nursing Practice in the Context of Hospitals.

Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes Ribeiro, Letícia de Lima Trindade, André Filipe Morais Pinto Novo, Carla Gomes da Rocha, Clemente Neves Sousa, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral Teles, Ana Catarina Rodrigues da Silva Reis, Alessandro Rodrigues Perondi, Karen Cristina Kades Andrigue, Soraia Cristina de Abreu Pereira and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nurses' perspectives on nurses' work methods.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes RibeiroNursing School of Porto, Center for Health Technology and Services Research, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9982-9537
Letícia de Lima TrindadeNursing Departament, Santa Catarina State University, Chapecó-Santa Catarina 89802-111, Brazil.
André Filipe Morais Pinto NovoInstituto Politécnico de Bragança, Center for Health Technology and Services Research, 5300-253 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8583-0406
Carla Gomes da RochaInstitute of Health, School of Health Sciences, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, CH-1950 Sion, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6302-7732
Clemente Neves SousaNursing School of Porto, Center for Health Technology and Services Research, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2654-0497
Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral TelesSchool of Economics, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7969-1403
Ana Catarina Rodrigues da Silva ReisCentro Hospitalar, Universitário de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
Alessandro Rodrigues PerondiDepartament of Nursing, University of Paraná, Francicso Beltrão 85601-000, Brazil.
Karen Cristina Kades AndrigueNursing Departament, Regional Community University of Chapecó, Chapecó-Santa Catarina 89802-000, Brazil.
Soraia Cristina de Abreu PereiraACES Entre Douro e Vouga I-Feira/Arouca, North Region Health Administration, 4000-447 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8011-378X
Paula Cristina da Silva LeiteACES Entre Douro e Vouga I-Feira/Arouca, North Region Health Administration, 4000-447 Porto, Portugal.
João Miguel Almeida Ventura-SilvaCentro Hospitalar, Universitário de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed challenges to health systems and institutions, which had to quickly create conditions to meet the growing health needs of the population. Thus, this study aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on professional nursing practice environments and to identify the variables that affected their quality. Quantitative, observational study, conducted in 16 Portuguese hospitals, with 1575 nurses. Data were collected using a questionnaire and participants responded to two different moments in time: the pre-pandemic period and after the fourth critical period of COVID-19. The pandemic had a positive impact on the Structure and Outcome components, and a negative trend in the Process component. The variables associated with the qualification of the components and their dimensions were predominantly: work context, the exercise of functions in areas of assistance to COVID-19 patients, length of professional experience and length of experience in the service. The investment in professional practice environments impacted the improvement of organizational factors, supporting the development of nurses' work towards the quality of care. However, it is necessary to invest in nurses' participation, involvement and professional qualifications, which are aspects strongly dependent on the institutions' management strategies.

Indexed as

coronavirus infectionhospitalspandemicquality of health carework environment

Identifiers

PMID35206940
PMCPMC8872092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.