Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35206905›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Detecting Depression Signs on Social Media: A Systematic Literature Review.

Rafael Salas-Zárate, Giner Alor-Hernández, María Del Pilar Salas-Zárate, Mario Andrés Paredes-Valverde, Maritza Bustos-López, José Luis Sánchez-Cervantes

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Detecting Suicidal Ideation in Social Media: An Ensemble Method Based on Feature Fusion.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rafael Salas-ZárateTecnológico Nacional de México/I. T. Orizaba, Av. Oriente 9 No. 852, Col. Emiliano Zapata, Orizaba 94320, Veracruz, Mexico.
Giner Alor-HernándezTecnológico Nacional de México/I. T. Orizaba, Av. Oriente 9 No. 852, Col. Emiliano Zapata, Orizaba 94320, Veracruz, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3296-0981
María Del Pilar Salas-ZárateTecnológico Nacional de México/I.T.S. Teziutlán, Fracción I y II S/N, Aire Libre, Teziutlán 73960, Puebla, Mexico.
Mario Andrés Paredes-ValverdeTecnológico Nacional de México/I.T.S. Teziutlán, Fracción I y II S/N, Aire Libre, Teziutlán 73960, Puebla, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9508-9818
Maritza Bustos-LópezCentro de Investigación en Inteligencia Artificial/Universidad Veracruzana, Sebastián Camacho 5, Zona Centro, Centro, Xalapa-Enríquez 91000, Veracruz, Mexico.
José Luis Sánchez-CervantesCONACYT-Tecnológico Nacional de México/I. T. Orizaba, Av. Oriente 9 No. 852, Col. Emiliano Zapata, Orizaba 94320, Veracruz, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-5194-1263
Tecnológico Nacional de México · MXUniversidad Veracruzana · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among mental health diseases, depression is one of the most severe, as it often leads to suicide; due to this, it is important to identify and summarize existing evidence concerning depression sign detection research on social media using the data provided by users. This review examines aspects of primary studies exploring depression detection from social media submissions (from 2016 to mid-2021). The search for primary studies was conducted in five digital libraries: ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore Digital Library, SpringerLink, Science Direct, and PubMed, as well as on the search engine Google Scholar to broaden the results. Extracting and synthesizing the data from each paper was the main activity of this work. Thirty-four primary studies were analyzed and evaluated. Twitter was the most studied social media for depression sign detection. Word embedding was the most prominent linguistic feature extraction method. Support vector machine (SVM) was the most used machine-learning algorithm. Similarly, the most popular computing tool was from Python libraries. Finally, cross-validation (CV) was the most common statistical analysis method used to evaluate the results obtained. Using social media along with computing tools and classification methods contributes to current efforts in public healthcare to detect signs of depression from sources close to patients.

Indexed as

depressionsentiment analysissocial media

Identifiers

PMID35206905
PMCPMC8871802
OpenAlexW4210677910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.