ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Cost-Effectiveness of Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-Naïve Men: Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography vs. Multiparametric Diagnostic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post-Treatment Imaging in Focal Therapy: Understanding TARGET and PI-FAB Scoring Systems.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Current practice and perceptions of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and multiparametric ultrasound and prostatic biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis in China: a nationwide survey.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Complexed hyaluronic acid-based nanoparticles in cancer therapy and diagnosis: Research trends by natural language processing.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Integrating shear wave elastography and multiparametric MRI for accurate prostate cancer diagnosis.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Ultrasound elastography: advances and challenges in early detection of breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Research on the mean maximum Young's modulus value as a new diagnostic parameter for prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prostate Cancer: Genetics, Epigenetics and the Need for Immunological Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This exploratory study investigates the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) imaging in comparison to pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in men with suspected prostate cancer. This research is motivated by the early evidence of the good performance of SWE in distinguishing cancerous from benign prostate tissues. We used a decision analysis model representing the care-pathways of men referred with a high prostate specific antigen (PSA) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) in a UK setting from the payer's perspective with results reported in 2016 GBP. We then appraised the cost-effectiveness of a novel approach based on SWE compared to the more conventional and widely practiced mpMRI-based approaches using data reported in the literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to address uncertainty regarding the parameter values utilised. Our exploratory results implied that SWE approach yielded an additional quality-adjusted life year (QALY) at the cost of GBP 10,048 compared to the standard mpMRI-based approach in the UK. This is lower than the official willingness to pay threshold of GBP 20,000 (the UK healthcare system guidelines) and is therefore a suitable replacement for the current practice. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of our results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.