Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35206820›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in COVID-19 Infected Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Malshani L Pathirathna, Buddhini P P Samarasekara, Thakshila S Dasanayake, Padmapriya Saravanakumar, Ishanka Weerasekara

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. COVID-19 vaccine and pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Do timing and severity of gestational COVID-19 impact perinatal and neonatal outcomes?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Association ofViruses · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Malshani L PathirathnaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Kandy 20400, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0002-6898-5315
Buddhini P P SamarasekaraDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Kandy 20400, Sri Lanka.
Thakshila S DasanayakeDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Kandy 20400, Sri Lanka.
Padmapriya SaravanakumarSchool of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Ishanka WeerasekaraDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Kandy 20400, Sri Lanka.
University of Peradeniya · LKAuckland University of Technology · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of COVID-19 virus infection during pregnancy is still unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantitatively pool the evidence on impact of COVID-19 infection on perinatal outcomes. Databases of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched using the keywords related to COVID-19 and perinatal outcomes from December 2019 to 30 June 2021. Observational studies comparing the perinatal outcomes of COVID-19 infection in pregnancy with a non-infected comparator were included. The screening process and quality assessment of the included studies were performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses were used to pool the comparative dichotomous data on perinatal outcomes. The database search yielded 4049 results, 1254 of which were duplicates. We included a total of 21 observational studies that assessed the adverse perinatal outcomes with COVID-19 infection. The odds of maternal death (pooled OR: 7.05 [2.41-20.65]), preeclampsia (pooled OR: 1.39 [1.29-1.50]), cesarean delivery (pooled OR: 1.67 [1.29-2.15]), fetal distress (pooled OR: 1.66 [1.35-2.05]), preterm birth (pooled OR: 1.86 [1.34-2.58]), low birth weight (pooled OR: 1.69 [1.35-2.11]), stillbirth (pooled OR: 1.46 [1.16-1.85]), 5th minute Apgar score of less than 7 (pooled OR: 1.44 [1.11-1.86]) and admissions to neonatal intensive care unit (pooled OR: 2.12 [1.36-3.32]) were higher among COVID-19 infected pregnant women compared to non-infected pregnant women.

Indexed as

COVID-19perinatal outcomessystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35206820
PMCPMC8871986
OpenAlexW4205515778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.