Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35206755›Full record

ArticleInsects2022

Quality Control Methods for

Georgios D Mastronikolos, Apostolos Kapranas, George K Balatsos, Charalampos Ioannou, Dimitrios P Papachristos, Panagiotis G Milonas, Arianna Puggioli, Igor Pajović, Dušan Petrić, Romeo Bellini and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sterility ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Optimization ofInsects · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Georgios D MastronikolosLaboratory of Entomology Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, 38446 Volos, Greece.
Apostolos KapranasScientific Directorate of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 14561 Kifissia, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5542-0470
George K BalatsosScientific Directorate of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 14561 Kifissia, Greece.
Charalampos IoannouLaboratory of Entomology Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, 38446 Volos, Greece.
Dimitrios P PapachristosScientific Directorate of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 14561 Kifissia, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0524-0180
Panagiotis G MilonasScientific Directorate of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 14561 Kifissia, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-5391-7750
Arianna PuggioliCentro Agricoltura Ambiente "G. Nicoli", 40014 Crevalcore, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5376-5213
Igor PajovićBiotechnical Faculty, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro.ORCID 0000-0001-8574-2094
Dušan PetrićFaculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
Romeo BelliniCentro Agricoltura Ambiente "G. Nicoli", 40014 Crevalcore, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9336-9111
Antonios MichaelakisScientific Directorate of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 14561 Kifissia, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3075-5020
Nikos T PapadopoulosLaboratory of Entomology Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, 38446 Volos, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2480-8189
Benaki Phytopathological Institute · GRUniversity of Thessaly · GRCentro Agricoltura Ambiente (Italy) · ITAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRUniversity of Montenegro · MEUniversity of Novi Sad · RS

Funding

State Scholarships Foundation 2018-050-0502-14736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic based mosquito control methods have been gaining ground in recent years for their potential to achieve effective suppression or replacement of vector populations without hampering environments or causing any public health risk. These methods require the mass rearing of the target species in large facilities sized to produce millions of sterile males, as already well established for a number of insects of agricultural importance. Assessing the performance of released males in Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) control programs is of the utmost importance for the success of the operation. Besides the negative effects of mass rearing and sterilization, the handling of sterilized insects and shipment to distant areas may also negatively impact the quality of sterilized males. The aim of the current study was to design and executive quality control (QC) tests for sterilized

Indexed as

invasive mosquito speciesmass rearingmosquito controlshippingSterile Insect Releases Technique

Identifiers

PMID35206755
PMCPMC8878208
OpenAlexW4211017864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.