Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35206749›Full record

ArticleInsects2022

Monitoring Temporal Trends in Internet Searches for "Ticks" across Europe by Google Trends: Tick-Human Interaction or General Interest?

Per M Jensen, Finn Danielsen, Sigurdur Skarphedinsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Per M JensenDepartment of Plants and Environmental Science, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8792-7711
Finn DanielsenNordic Foundation for Development and Ecology (NORDECO), Skindergade 23, 3rd Floor, 1159 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sigurdur SkarphedinssonClinical Center for Emerging and Vector-borne Infections, Department of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital, Winsloews vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8440-7040

Funding

European Commission 727890, 869673 and 862731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring vector-human interaction is pivotal for assessing potential transmission rates of vector borne diseases and their associated public health impact. People often seek information following an insect bite in order to identify hematophagous arthropods, which in recent years often is done using Internet resources. Through this activity, a record of net searches is generated, which include information that reflect local human-arthropod interaction, e.g., for the common tick (

Indexed as

Google TrendsIxodes ricinustick–human contactvector bone diseases

Identifiers

PMID35206749
PMCPMC8877544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.