Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35206703›Full record

ArticleInsects2022

Cricket Meal (

Burarat Phesatcha, Kampanat Phesatcha, Bounnaxay Viennaxay, Maharach Matra, Pajaree Totakul, Metha Wanapat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Synergistic Effect ofBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Heliyon · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Unraveling the physicochemical attributes of three cricket (Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft + [i.e. und] Technologie. Food science + technology. Science + technologie alimentaire · 2023
    Article
  11. Are insects a solution for feeding ruminants? Legislation, scientific evidence, and future challenges.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Burarat PhesatchaDepartment of Agricultural Technology and Environment, Faculty of Sciences and Liberal Arts, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6137-1372
Kampanat PhesatchaDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Technology, Nakhon Phanom University, Nakhon Phanom 48000, Thailand.
Bounnaxay ViennaxayTropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0173-5239
Maharach MatraTropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2865-1836
Pajaree TotakulTropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Metha WanapatTropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7633-052X

Funding

Post-Doctoral training scholarship, Khon Kaen University PD2563-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this work was to conduct the effects of cricket (

Indexed as

cricket mealdigestibilityproteinruminal fermentation

Identifiers

PMID35206703
PMCPMC8877429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.