ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
Remote, Hybrid, and On-Site Work during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic and the Consequences for Stress and Work Engagement.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Relationship Between Psychological Distress, Burnout and Work Engagement in Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.International journal of public health · 2022Pooled it
- Hybrid Work in German Public Administration: Social Resources, Occupational Health Literacy and Work Design Competencies in Association with Work Engagement.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Psychological contract reconstruction in co-working modes and its impact on organizational commitment: an empirical study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Job demands and resources perceived by hybrid working employees in German public administration: a qualitative study.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Beyond Work: The Role of "Family-Friendly" Practices in the Subjective Well-Being of Teleworkers and On-Site Workers in the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- The Need for Systems Approaches for Precision Communications in Public Health.Journal of health communication · 2023Article
- Editorial: Impact of digitalization on workers' health and work-life balance.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Variations of work engagement and psychological distress based on three working modalities during the COVID-19 pandemic.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Work fatigue during COVID-19 lockdown teleworking: the role of psychosocial, environmental, and social working conditions.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- A Comparison of Working Conditions and Workers' Perceptions among On-Site, Telework, and Hybrid Workers in Ecuador during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Dynamic Demand Evaluation of COVID-19 Medical Facilities in Wuhan Based on Public Sentiment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Perceived Risk of COVID-19 and Employee Decision-Making: How Psychological Distress during the Pandemic Increases Negative Performance Outcomes among Healthcare Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the COVID-19 pandemic having disrupted economies, businesses, and individual activities, it is important to examine how different forms of work affect employee behaviour. This study applies work engagement (the key construct in organisational psychology) as the dependent variable and considers its determinants in the form of stress factors and attitudes toward remote work. A cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 544 (Female = 58.5%) workers were surveyed: remote (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.