Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35206372›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Krebs von den Lungen-6 as Disease Severity Marker for COVID-19 Patients: Analytical Verification and Quality Assessment of the Tosoh AIA-360 Compared to Lumipulse G600II.

Miriana d'Alessandro, Laura Bergantini, Dalila Cavallaro, Sara Gangi, Paolo Cameli, Edoardo Conticini, Siena Covid Unit, Bruno Frediani, Francesco Dotta, Elena Bargagli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Miriana d'AlessandroRespiratory Diseases and Lung Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2368-5722
Laura BergantiniRespiratory Diseases and Lung Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1118-3223
Dalila CavallaroRespiratory Diseases and Lung Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Sara GangiRespiratory Diseases and Lung Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Paolo CameliRespiratory Diseases and Lung Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8639-2882
Edoardo ConticiniRheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3974-6606
Siena Covid Unit
Bruno FredianiRheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Francesco DottaDiabetes Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena and Fondazione Umberto Di Mario ONLUS-Toscana Life Science Park, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4947-7478
Elena BargagliRespiratory Diseases and Lung Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
University of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKrebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) has been proposed as a disease severity marker of COVID-19. All research articles reported the KL-6 assay detected through Fujirebio reagents by Lumipulse G600/G1200 instrument. In the present study, KL-6 assay was analysed through Tosoh AIA-360 and compared with analytical results by Lumipulse G600 in a population of COVID-19 patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty-four patients (median age, IQR 67 (58-76) years), all hospitalized for COVID-19 interstitial pneumonia at Siena COVID Unit. KL-6 was measured by two methods, chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) and fluorescent enzyme immunoassay (FEIA) method by Lumipulse G600 II and AIA 360 systems, respectively.

resultsKL-6 concentrations evaluated by Lumipulse G600II were significantly higher in severe than those in non-severe patients (

conclusionsIn conclusion, our study demonstrated that CLEIA and FEIA methods for serum KL-6 detection are comparable and reliable. KL-6 was confirmed as an easily detectable and effective biomarker to identify severe COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedArea Under CurveBiomarkersHumansSARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness IndexBiomarkersanalytical validationCOVID-19Krebs von den Lungen-6

Identifiers

PMID35206372
PMCPMC8872393
OpenAlexW4213215925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.