Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35206329›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Proposed Standard Test Protocols and Outcome Measures for Quantitative Comparison of Emissions from Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems.

Edward C Hensel, Nathan C Eddingsaas, Qutaiba M Saleh, Shehan Jayasekera, Samantha Emma Sarles, A Gary DiFrancesco, Risa J Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edward C HenselDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2682-0766
Nathan C EddingsaasSchool of Chemistry and Materials Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.
Qutaiba M SalehElectrical and Computer Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9322-8909
Shehan JayasekeraMechanical and Industrial Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1222-4813
Samantha Emma SarlesBiomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.
A Gary DiFrancescoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.
Risa J RobinsonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8488-5448

Funding

Understanding the Association Between Electronic Cigarette Aerosol Emissions, Tobacco Product Characteristics and User Topography and Consumption BehaviorR21ES029984 · NIEHS · ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HENSEL, EDWARD CHARLES · 2019 to 2020
$403k
NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES029984NIEHS NIH HHS R21ES029984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study introduces and demonstrates a comprehensive, accurate, unbiased approach to robust quantitative comparison of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) appropriate for establishing substantial equivalence (or lack thereof) between inhaled nicotine products. The approach is demonstrated across a family of thirteen pen- and pod-style ENDS products. Methods employed consist of formulating a robust emissions surface regression model, quantifying the empirical accuracy of the model as applied to each product, evaluating relationships between product design characteristics and maximum emissions characteristics, and presenting results in formats useful to researchers, regulators, and consumers. Results provide a response surface to characterize emissions (total particulate matter and constituents thereof) from each ENDS appropriate for use in a computer model and for conducting quantitative exposure comparisons between products. Results demonstrate that emissions vary as a function of puff duration, flow rate, e-liquid composition, and device operating power. Further, results indicate that regulating design characteristics of ENDS devices and consumables may not achieve desired public health outcomes; it is more effective to regulate maximum permissible emissions directly. Three emissions outcome measures (yield per puff, mass concentration, and constituent mass ratio) are recommended for adoption as standard quantities for reporting by manufacturers and research laboratories. The approach provides a means of: (a) quantifying and comparing maximal emissions from ENDS products spanning their entire operating envelope, (b) comparative evaluation of ENDS devices and consumable design characteristics, and (c) establishing comparative equivalence of maximal emissions from ENDS. A consumer-oriented product emissions dashboard is proposed for comparative evaluation of ENDS exposure potential. Maximum achievable power dissipated in the coil of ENDS is identified as a potentially effective regulatory parameter.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAerosolsNicotineOutcome Assessment, Health CareParticulate MatterAerosolsNicotineParticulate Mattere-cigarettenicotinepublic healthregulatory sciencesubstantial equivalencetobacco product comparison

Identifiers

PMID35206329
PMCPMC8871820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.