Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35206299›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Group Triple P Intervention Effects on Children and Parents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sandra Nogueira, Ana Catarina Canário, Isabel Abreu-Lima, Pedro Teixeira, Orlanda Cruz

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Tuning in to KidsBMC psychology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Interventions for Young Children's Mental Health: A Review of Reviews.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra NogueiraFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.
Ana Catarina CanárioFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4206-2109
Isabel Abreu-LimaFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.
Pedro TeixeiraSchool of Medicine, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6322-4923
Orlanda CruzFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3646-5067
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Minho · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supporting parents through the delivery of evidence-based parenting interventions (EBPI) is a way of promoting children's rights, given the known benefits to child development and family wellbeing. Group Triple P (GTP) is an EBPI suitable for parents of children aged 2-12 years, who experience parenting difficulties, and/or child behavior problems. Even though GTP has been intensively studied, information lacks on the magnitude of its effects, considering the risk of bias within and across prior research. To address this, a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration CRD42019085360) to evaluate the effects of GTP on child and parent outcomes at short- and longer-term was performed. Through a systematic search of a set of databases, 737 research papers were identified, and 11 trials were selected. The risk of bias within and across studies was evaluated. Significant positive effects of GTP were found immediately after the intervention for child behavior problems, dysfunctional parenting practices, parenting sense of competence, psychological adjustment, parental stress levels, conflict, and relationship quality. Six months after the intervention, positive effects were found only for child behavior problems. Data suggest that GTP might be an effective EBPI leading to positive family outcomes. Substantial risk of bias was found, highlighting the importance of improving the quality of research.

Indexed as

ParentingProblem BehaviorAdaptation, PsychologicalChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolChild RearingHumanschildren’s behaviorevidence-based parenting interventionsGroup Triple Plevel 4 interventionparenting supportparents’ outcomesrisk of biassystematic review and meta-analysisTriple P system

Identifiers

PMID35206299
PMCPMC8872306
OpenAlexW4213247862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.