Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35206124›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Hybrid Deep Feature Generation for Appropriate Face Mask Use Detection.

Emrah Aydemir, Mehmet Ali Yalcinkaya, Prabal Datta Barua, Mehmet Baygin, Oliver Faust, Sengul Dogan, Subrata Chakraborty, Turker Tuncer, U Rajendra Acharya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Review on Face Mask Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emrah AydemirDepartment of Management Information, College of Management, Sakarya University, Sakarya 54050, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-8380-7891
Mehmet Ali YalcinkayaDepartment of Computer Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Kirsehir Ahi Evran University, Kirsehir 40100, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7320-5643
Prabal Datta BaruaSchool of Management & Enterprise, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5117-8333
Mehmet BayginDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ardahan University, Ardahan 75000, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5258-754X
Oliver FaustDepartment of Engineering and Mathematics, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3979-4077
Sengul DoganDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, College of Technology, Firat University, Elazig 23119, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9677-5684
Subrata ChakrabortySchool of Science and Technology, Faculty of Science, Agriculture, Business and Law, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0102-5424
Turker TuncerDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, College of Technology, Firat University, Elazig 23119, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5126-6445
U Rajendra AcharyaDepartment of Electronics and Computer Engineering, Ngee Ann Polytechnic, Singapore 599489, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2689-8552

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mask usage is one of the most important precautions to limit the spread of COVID-19. Therefore, hygiene rules enforce the correct use of face coverings. Automated mask usage classification might be used to improve compliance monitoring. This study deals with the problem of inappropriate mask use. To address that problem, 2075 face mask usage images were collected. The individual images were labeled as either mask, no masked, or improper mask. Based on these labels, the following three cases were created: Case 1: mask versus no mask versus improper mask, Case 2: mask versus no mask + improper mask, and Case 3: mask versus no mask. This data was used to train and test a hybrid deep feature-based masked face classification model. The presented method comprises of three primary stages: (i) pre-trained ResNet101 and DenseNet201 were used as feature generators; each of these generators extracted 1000 features from an image; (ii) the most discriminative features were selected using an improved RelieF selector; and (iii) the chosen features were used to train and test a support vector machine classifier. That resulting model attained 95.95%, 97.49%, and 100.0% classification accuracy rates on Case 1, Case 2, and Case 3, respectively. Having achieved these high accuracy values indicates that the proposed model is fit for a practical trial to detect appropriate face mask use in real time.

Indexed as

COVID-19MasksHumansSARS-CoV-2Support Vector MachineDenseNet201face mask detectionhybrid feature selectorResNet101support vector machinetransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID35206124
PMCPMC8871993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.