Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35206113›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

What Patients Prioritize for Research to Improve Their Lives and How Their Priorities Get Dismissed again.

Barbara Groot, Annyk Haveman, Mireille Buree, Ruud van Zuijlen, Juliette van Zuijlen, Tineke Abma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Older Adults' Engagement in Residential Care: Pitfalls, Potentials, and the Role of ICTs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbara GrootDepartment Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden University, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7495-3048
Annyk HavemanCentrum voor Cliëntervaringen, Jacob Bontiusplaats 9 (INIT-gebouw), 1018 LL Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mireille BureeCentrum voor Cliëntervaringen, Jacob Bontiusplaats 9 (INIT-gebouw), 1018 LL Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ruud van ZuijlenCentrum voor Cliëntervaringen, Jacob Bontiusplaats 9 (INIT-gebouw), 1018 LL Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Juliette van ZuijlenCentrum voor Cliëntervaringen, Jacob Bontiusplaats 9 (INIT-gebouw), 1018 LL Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tineke AbmaDepartment Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden University, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health researchers increasingly work with patients in a participatory fashion. Active patient involvement throughout the research process can provide epistemic justice to patients who have often only had an informant role in traditional health research. This study aims to conduct participatory research on patient experiences to create a solid research agenda with patients and discuss it with relevant stakeholders. We followed a participatory research design in 18 sub-studies, including interviews and group sessions (

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationQuality of LifeHumansResearch PersonnelSocial Justiceabuseassistance dogsassistive technologycommunity of practiceco-researchersdependencyepistemic injusticeparticipatory health researchpatient perspectivepeer support

Identifiers

PMID35206113
PMCPMC8871903
OpenAlexW4211108109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.