Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35205784›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Safety and Efficacy of Indocyanine Green in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 11,047 Patients.

Kamil Safiejko, Radoslaw Tarkowski, Tomasz Piotr Kozlowski, Maciej Koselak, Marcin Jachimiuk, Aleksander Tarasik, Michal Pruc, Jacek Smereka, Lukasz Szarpak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kamil SafiejkoColorectal Cancer Unit, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Bialystok Oncology Center, 15-027 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0373-9911
Radoslaw TarkowskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Regional Specialist Hospital, 55-220 Legnica, Poland.
Tomasz Piotr KozlowskiColorectal Cancer Unit, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Bialystok Oncology Center, 15-027 Bialystok, Poland.
Maciej KoselakInstitute of Outcomes Research, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Medical Academy, 03-411 Warsaw, Poland.
Marcin JachimiukColorectal Cancer Unit, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Bialystok Oncology Center, 15-027 Bialystok, Poland.
Aleksander TarasikColorectal Cancer Unit, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Bialystok Oncology Center, 15-027 Bialystok, Poland.
Michal PrucResearch Unit, Polish Society of Disaster Medicine, 05-806 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2140-9732
Jacek SmerekaResearch Unit, Polish Society of Disaster Medicine, 05-806 Warsaw, Poland.
Lukasz SzarpakColorectal Cancer Unit, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Bialystok Oncology Center, 15-027 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0973-5455

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the technological advances and improved surgical skills, the incidence of anastomotic leakage following colorectal cancer surgery still ranges from 4% to 19%. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of indocyanine green (ICG) use in colorectal cancer surgery. An online search of the Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases (from inception to 10 November 2021) was performed, in addition to manual screening. Thirty-two studies involving 11,047 patients were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. The anastomotic leak rate in the ICG and non-ICG groups varied and amounted to 3.7% vs. 7.6%, respectively (RR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.39-0.56;

Indexed as

anastomotic leakcolorectal anastomosesfluorescenceindocyanine green (ICG)meta-analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35205784
PMCPMC8869881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.