ReviewCancers2022
Tumor Microenvironment and Hydrogel-Based 3D Cancer Models for In Vitro Testing Immunotherapies.
Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling blood-brain barrier-glioblastoma interactions: implications for chemoresistance and therapeutic targeting.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2026Review
- Mapping the evolving landscape of conductive hydrogels in medicine: A bibliometric perspective.Regenerative therapy · 2026Article
- Transforming Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy Through Fluorescent Hydrogels: A Review.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Tumor Assembloids as Three-Dimensional Platforms for Modeling Drug Delivery Barriers: Construction Strategies, Applications, and Translational Challenges.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Membrane IL-18 identifies a human macrophage subset with distinct proteomic and functional traits.Oncoimmunology · 2025Article
- Characterization of glioma spheroid viability and metastatic potential following monophasic and biphasic pulsed electric fields.Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- From lab to life: technological innovations in transforming cancer metastasis detection and therapy.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- 3D cell culture model - a substitution for future in vivo fish study?Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Advances in Materials Science for Precision Melanoma Therapy: Nanotechnology-Enhanced Drug Delivery Systems.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Combining CD3/GD2 bispecific T cell engager with human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells facilitates neuroblastoma cell targeting and killing in vitro.PloS one · 2025Article
- Cancer 3D Models: Essential Tools for Understanding and Overcoming Drug Resistance.Oncology research · 2025Review
- Advances in precision oncology using patient-derived organoids and functional biomaterials.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Advanced Hydrogels in Breast Cancer Therapy.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Alginate-Chitosan Biodegradable and Biocompatible Based Hydrogel for Breast Cancer Immunotherapy and Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review.ACS applied bio materials · 2024Review
- Design approaches for 3D cell culture and 3D bioprinting platforms.Biophysics reviews · 2024Review
- Advancement in Cancer Vasculogenesis Modeling through 3D Bioprinting Technology.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Cell Membrane Fragment-Wrapped Parenteral Nanoemulsions: A New Drug Delivery Tool to Target Gliomas.Cells · 2024Article
- Fluid-Dynamic Culture of Tumour and Immune Cells for More Predictive Infiltration Studies and Immunotherapy Drug Screening.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Advances in tissue engineering and biofabrication forBioprinting (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Engineered Vasculature for Cancer Research and Regenerative Medicine.Micromachines · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising novel therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment. In a relevant percentage of patients, however, clinical benefits are lower than expected, pushing researchers to deeply analyze the immune responses against tumors and find more reliable and efficient tools to predict the individual response to therapy. Novel tissue engineering strategies can be adopted to realize in vitro fully humanized matrix-based models, as a compromise between standard two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures and animal tests, which are costly and hardly usable in personalized medicine. In this review, we describe the main mechanisms allowing cancer cells to escape the immune surveillance, which may play a significant role in the failure of immunotherapies. In particular, we discuss the role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in the establishment of a milieu that greatly favors cancer malignant progression and impact on the interactions with immune cells. Then, we present an overview of the recent in vitro engineered preclinical three-dimensional (3D) models that have been adopted to resemble the interplays between cancer and immune cells and for testing current therapies and immunotherapeutic approaches. Specifically, we focus on 3D hydrogel-based tools based on different types of polymers, discussing the suitability of each of them in reproducing the TME key features based on their intrinsic or tunable characteristics. Finally, we introduce the possibility to combine the 3D models with technological fluid dynamics platforms, reproducing the dynamic complex interactions between tumor cells and immune effectors migrated in situ via the systemic circulation, pointing out the challenges that still have to be overcome for setting more predictive preclinical assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.