Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35205760›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Tumor Microenvironment and Hydrogel-Based 3D Cancer Models for In Vitro Testing Immunotherapies.

Chiara Vitale, Monica Marzagalli, Silvia Scaglione, Alessandra Dondero, Cristina Bottino, Roberta Castriconi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Advanced Hydrogels in Breast Cancer Therapy.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Advances in tissue engineering and biofabrication forBioprinting (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chiara VitaleDepartment of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2865-1281
Monica MarzagalliReact4life SRL, 16121 Genova, Italy.
Silvia ScaglioneReact4life SRL, 16121 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9464-3554
Alessandra DonderoDepartment of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Cristina BottinoDepartment of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6695-1739
Roberta CastriconiDepartment of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2806-1115
University of Genoa · ITInstitute of Electronics, Computer and Telecommunication Engineering · ITIstituto Giannina Gaslini · IT

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health "Ricerca Corrente 2021" and "5 per mille" (project 5M-2018-23680422)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising novel therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment. In a relevant percentage of patients, however, clinical benefits are lower than expected, pushing researchers to deeply analyze the immune responses against tumors and find more reliable and efficient tools to predict the individual response to therapy. Novel tissue engineering strategies can be adopted to realize in vitro fully humanized matrix-based models, as a compromise between standard two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures and animal tests, which are costly and hardly usable in personalized medicine. In this review, we describe the main mechanisms allowing cancer cells to escape the immune surveillance, which may play a significant role in the failure of immunotherapies. In particular, we discuss the role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in the establishment of a milieu that greatly favors cancer malignant progression and impact on the interactions with immune cells. Then, we present an overview of the recent in vitro engineered preclinical three-dimensional (3D) models that have been adopted to resemble the interplays between cancer and immune cells and for testing current therapies and immunotherapeutic approaches. Specifically, we focus on 3D hydrogel-based tools based on different types of polymers, discussing the suitability of each of them in reproducing the TME key features based on their intrinsic or tunable characteristics. Finally, we introduce the possibility to combine the 3D models with technological fluid dynamics platforms, reproducing the dynamic complex interactions between tumor cells and immune effectors migrated in situ via the systemic circulation, pointing out the challenges that still have to be overcome for setting more predictive preclinical assays.

Indexed as

3D cancer modelsbiomaterialsimmunotherapiestumor escape mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID35205760
PMCPMC8870468
OpenAlexW4213332501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.