Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35205727›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Detection of Cancer Mutations by Urine Liquid Biopsy as a Potential Tool in the Clinical Management of Bladder Cancer Patients.

Nurul Khalida Ibrahim, Ahmed Eraky, Jan Eggers, Tim Alexander Steiert, Susanne Sebens, Klaus-Peter Jünemann, Alexander Hendricks, Corinna Bang, Martin Stanulla, Andre Franke and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Nurul Khalida IbrahimDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hanover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7040-2916
Ahmed ErakyDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Jan EggersDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Tim Alexander SteiertInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel University, 24105 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0125-1173
Susanne SebensInstitute for Experimental Cancer Research, Kiel University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Klaus-Peter JünemannDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Alexander HendricksDepartment of General Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Corinna BangInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel University, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Martin StanullaDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hanover, Germany.
Andre FrankeInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel University, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Claudius HamannDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Christoph RöckenDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6989-8002
Norbert ArnoldInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel University, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Laura HinzeDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hanover, Germany.
Michael ForsterInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel University, 24105 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9927-5124

Funding

José Carreras Leukemia Foundation PSG 02/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The standard diagnostic and follow-up examination for bladder cancer is diagnostic cystoscopy, an invasive test that requires compliance for a long period. Urine cytology and recent biomarkers come short of replacing cystoscopy. Urine liquid biopsy promises to solve this problem and potentially allows early detection, evaluation of treatment efficacy, and surveillance. A previous study reached 52-68% sensitivity using small-panel sequencing but could increase sensitivity to 68-83% by adding aneuploidy and promoter mutation detection. Here, we explore whether a large 127-gene panel alone is sufficient to detect tumor mutations in urine from bladder cancer patients. We recruited twelve bladder cancer patients, obtained preoperative and postoperative urine samples, and successfully analyzed samples from eleven patients. In ten patients, we found at least one mutation in bladder-cancer-associated genes, i.e., a promising sensitivity of 91%. In total, we identified 114 variants, of which 90 were predicted as nonbenign, 30% were associated with cancer, and 13% were actionable according to the CIViC database. Sanger sequencing of the patients' formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues confirmed the findings. We concluded that incorporating urine liquid biopsy is a promising strategy in the management of bladder cancer patients.

Indexed as

bladder cancercancer mutationliquid biopsymolecular diagnosticurine

Identifiers

PMID35205727
PMCPMC8870091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.