Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35205635›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Compared Efficacy of Adjuvant Intravesical BCG-TICE vs. BCG-RIVM for High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC): A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Francesco Del Giudice, Rocco Simone Flammia, Benjamin I Chung, Marco Moschini, Benjamin Pradere, Andrea Mari, Francesco Soria, Simone Albisinni, Wojciech Krajewski, Tomasz Szydełko and 26 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors at 15 institutions in 8 countries.

Francesco Del GiudiceDepartment of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" Rome University, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3865-5988
Rocco Simone FlammiaDepartment of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" Rome University, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3129-0544
Benjamin I ChungDepartment of Urology, Stanford Medical Center, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Marco MoschiniDepartment of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Benjamin PradereDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7768-8558
Andrea MariUnit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9070-5706
Francesco SoriaUrology Division, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Studies of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Simone AlbisinniUrology Department, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Wojciech KrajewskiDepartment of Urology and Oncological Urology, Wrocław Medical University, 50-556 Wrocław, Poland.
Tomasz SzydełkoDepartment of Urology and Oncological Urology, Wrocław Medical University, 50-556 Wrocław, Poland.
Ekaterina LaukhtinaDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8953-0272
David D'AndreaDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1625-1077
Andrea GallioliUnit of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.
Laura S MertensDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martina MaggiDepartment of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" Rome University, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4672-850X
Alessandro SciarraDepartment of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" Rome University, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7899-8056
Stefano SalcicciaDepartment of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" Rome University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Matteo FerroDivision of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO)-IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9250-7858
Carlo Maria ScornajenghiDepartment of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" Rome University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo AseroDepartment of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" Rome University, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5293-9253
Susanna CattarinoDepartment of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" Rome University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Mario De AngelisDepartment of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Giovanni E CacciamaniUSC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Riccardo AutorinoDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7045-7725
Savio Domenico PandolfoDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9621-3059
Ugo Giovanni FalagarioDepartment of Neurosciences, Sciences of Reproduction, and Odontostomatology, Fderico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Nicola D'AltiliaDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico Riuniti di Foggia, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Vito ManciniDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico Riuniti di Foggia, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3050-8748
Marco ChiricoDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico Riuniti di Foggia, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Francesco CinelliDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico Riuniti di Foggia, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Carlo BettocchiDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico Riuniti di Foggia, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Luigi CormioDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico Riuniti di Foggia, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Giuseppe CarrieriDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico Riuniti di Foggia, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Ettore De BerardinisDepartment of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" Rome University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Gian Maria BusettoDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico Riuniti di Foggia, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7291-0316
On Behalf Of European Association Of Urology Eau-Young Academic Urologists Yau Urothelial Cancer Working Party
Policlinico Umberto I · ITUniversity of Foggia · ITMedical University of Vienna · ATSan Raffaele University of Rome · ITVirginia Commonwealth University · USWroclaw Medical University · PLIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITPuigvert Foundation · ESSechenov University · RUStanford Medicine · USThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntravesical immunotherapy with bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the standard therapy for high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The superiority of any BCG strain over another could not be demonstrated yet.

methodsPatients with NMIBCs underwent adjuvant induction ± maintenance schedule of intravesical immunotherapy with either BCG TICE or RIVM at two high-volume tertiary institutions. Only BCG-naïve patients and those treated with the same strain over the course of follow-up were included. One-to-one (1:1) propensity score matching (PSM) between the two cohorts was utilized to adjust for baseline demographic and tumor characteristics imbalances. Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox regression models according to high-risk NMIBC prognostic factors were implemented to address survival differences between the strains. Sub-group analysis modeling of the influence of routine secondary resection (re-TUR) in the setting of the sole maintenance adjuvant schedule for the two strains was further performed.

results852 Ta-T1 NMIBCs (

conclusionWhen routinely performing re-TUR followed by a maintenance BCG schedule, TICE was superior to RIVM for RFS outcomes. However, no significant differences were detected for PFS and CSS, respectively.

Indexed as

BCG-RIVMBCG strainBCG-TICEbladder cancercancer-specific survivalprogression-free survivalrecurrence-free survivalre-TUR

Identifiers

PMID35205635
PMCPMC8869903
OpenAlexW4211078547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.