ArticleCancers2022
Prediction Model for Pancreatic Cancer-A Population-Based Study from NHIRD.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Risk Prediction Models for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Integrin αvβ3-dependent pathogenic effect and therapeutic effects of DL-N2 combined with EGFR inhibitors in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Incorporation of explainable artificial intelligence in ensemble machine learning-driven pancreatic cancer diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Data privacy-aware machine learning approach in pancreatic cancer diagnosis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- The Role of Phytonutrient Kaempferol in the Prevention of Gastrointestinal Cancers: Recent Trends and Future Perspectives.Cancers · 2024Review
- Prevalence of eye and adnexal disorders among elderly inmates in Taiwan prisons.BMC public health · 2024Article
- An R Shiny Application (SDOH) for Predictive Modeling Using Regional Social Determinants of Health Survey Responses.International journal of social determinants of health and health services · 2024Article
- Integrating Machine Learning into Statistical Methods in Disease Risk Prediction Modeling: A Systematic Review.Health data science · 2024Review
- Uncovering the role of FXYD3 as a potential oncogene and early biomarker in pancreatic cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2024Article
- Predicting Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Survival after Curative Surgery via Deep Learning of Diffusion MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Automated classification of urine biomarkers to diagnose pancreatic cancer using 1-D convolutional neural networks.Journal of biological engineering · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence as a noninvasive tool for pancreatic cancer prediction and diagnosis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: Cancer has been the leading cause of death in Taiwan for 39 years, and among them, pancreatic cancer has been ranked seventh in the top ten cancer mortality rates for the past three years. While the incidence rate of pancreatic cancer is ranked at the bottom of the top 10 cancers, the survival rate is very low. Pancreatic cancer is one of the more difficult cancers to detect early due to the lack of early diagnostic tools. Early screening is important for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Only a few studies have designed predictive models for pancreatic cancer. (2) Methods: The Taiwan Health Insurance Database was used in this study, covering over 99% of the population in Taiwan. The subset sample was not significantly different from the original NHIRD sample. A machine learning approach was used to develop a predictive model for pancreatic cancer disease. Four models, including logistic regression, deep neural networks, ensemble learning, and voting ensemble were used in this study. The ROC curve and a confusion matrix were used to evaluate the accuracy of the pancreatic cancer prediction models. (3) Results: The AUC of the LR model was higher than the other three models in the external testing set for all three of the factor combinations. Sensitivity was best measured by the stacking model for the first factor combinations, and specificity was best measured by the DNN model for the second factor combination. The result of the model that used only nine factors (third factor combinations) was equal to the other two factor combinations. The AUC of the previous models for the early assessment of pancreatic cancer ranged from approximately 0.57 to 0.71. The AUC of this study was higher than that of previous studies and ranged from 0.71 to 0.76, which provides higher accuracy. (4) Conclusions: This study compared the performances of LR, DNN, stacking, and voting models for pancreatic cancer prediction and constructed a pancreatic cancer prediction model with accuracy higher than that of previous studies. This predictive model will improve awareness of the risk of pancreatic cancer and give patients with pancreatic cancer a simpler tool for early screening in the golden period when the disease can still be eradicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.