Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35205565›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Exergetic Analysis of a Cryogenic Air Separation Unit.

Sorin Bucsa, Alexandru Serban, Mugur C Balan, Claudia Ionita, Gabriel Nastase, Catalina Dobre, Alexandru Dobrovicescu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sorin BucsaDepartment of Engineering Thermodynamics, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.
Alexandru SerbanDepartment of Engineering Thermodynamics, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.
Mugur C BalanDepartment of Thermodynamics, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-2305-782X
Claudia IonitaDepartment of Engineering Thermodynamics, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.
Gabriel NastaseDepartment of Engineering Thermodynamics, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4843-0619
Catalina DobreDepartment of Engineering Thermodynamics, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0158-9924
Alexandru DobrovicescuDepartment of Engineering Thermodynamics, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9978-421X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This case study analyzes a cryogenic air separation unit (ASU) with a production of V˙O2=58,300 [m3Nh] of gaseous oxygen with a concentration greater than 98.5%, operating in Romania on a steel plant platform. The goal of the paper is to provide an extensive model of exergetic analysis that could be used in an optimization procedure when decisional parameters are changed or structural design modifications are implemented. For each key part of the Air Separation Unit, an exergetic product and fuel were defined and, based on their definition, the coefficient of performance of each functional zone was calculated. The information about the magnitude of the exergetic losses offers solutions for their future recovery. The analysis of the exergy destructions suggests when it is worth making a larger investment. The exergetic analysis of the compression area of the ASU points out an exergy destruction and loss of 37% from the total plant's electrical energy input. The exergy loss with the heat transferred to the cooling system of compressors can be recovered; for the exergy destruction portion, the challenge between investment and operating costs should be considered. The exergy destruction of the air separation columns found the High Pressure Column (HPC) to be more destructive than the Low Pressure Column. The share of the exergy destruction in the total plant's electrical energy input is 8.3% for the HPC. The local COP of the HPC, calculated depending on the total exergy of the local product and fuel, is 62.66%. The calculus of the air separation column is performed with the ChemSep simulator.

Indexed as

chemical exergycompression unitrectification column

Identifiers

PMID35205565
PMCPMC8870991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.