Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35205431›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

Distinct Minor Splicing Patterns across Cancers.

Lauren Levesque, Nicole Salazar, Scott William Roy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lauren LevesqueDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA.
Nicole SalazarDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8658-6553
Scott William RoyDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA.
San Francisco State University · US

Funding

ACKR3 and CXCR4 Contributions to the Tumor Microenvironment in Breast Cancer Racial DisparitiesSC2GM135135 · NIGMS · SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SALAZAR, NICOLE · 2020 to 2022
$465k
NIGMS NIH HHS SC2 GM135135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In human cells, the U12 spliceosome, also known as the minor spliceosome, is responsible for the splicing of 0.5% of introns, while the major U2 spliceosome is responsible for the other 99.5%. While many studies have been done to characterize and understand splicing dysregulation in cancer, almost all of them have focused on U2 splicing and ignored U12 splicing, despite evidence suggesting minor splicing is involved in cell cycle regulation. In this study, we analyzed RNA-seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas for 14 different cohorts to determine differential splicing of minor introns in tumor and adjacent normal tissue. We found that in some cohorts, such as breast cancer, there was a strong skew towards minor introns showing increased splicing in the tumor; in others, such as the renal chromophobe cell carcinoma cohort, the opposite pattern was found, with minor introns being much more likely to have decreased splicing in the tumor. Further analysis of gene expression did not reveal any candidate regulatory mechanisms that could cause these different minor splicing phenotypes between cohorts. Our data suggest context-dependent roles of the minor spliceosome in tumorigenesis and provides a foundation for further investigation of minor splicing in cancer, which could then serve as a basis for novel therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRNA SplicingHumansIntronsSpliceosomescancerminor intronsTCGAU12 splicing

Identifiers

PMID35205431
PMCPMC8871696
OpenAlexW4213222162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.