Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35205260›Full record

ReviewGenes2022

The Dynamic Behavior of Chromatin in Response to DNA Double-Strand Breaks.

Fabiola García Fernández, Emmanuelle Fabre

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Formation of chromosomal rearrangements inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Chromoplexy: A Pathway to Genomic Complexity and Cancer Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Chromoplexy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Multi-Scale Imaging of the Dynamic Organization of Chromatin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fabiola García FernándezInstitut Curie, CNRS UMR3664, Sorbonne Université, F-75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2909-236X
Emmanuelle FabreGénomes Biologie Cellulaire et Thérapeutiques, CNRS UMR7212, INSERM U944, Université de Paris, F-75010 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0009-4604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary functions of the eukaryotic nucleus as a site for the storage, retrieval, and replication of information require a highly dynamic chromatin organization, which can be affected by the presence of DNA damage. In response to double-strand breaks (DSBs), the mobility of chromatin at the break site is severely affected and, to a lesser extent, that of other chromosomes. The how and why of such movement has been widely studied over the last two decades, leading to different mechanistic models and proposed potential roles underlying both local and global mobility. Here, we review the state of the knowledge on current issues affecting chromatin mobility upon DSBs, and highlight its role as a crucial step in the DNA damage response (DDR).

Indexed as

ChromatinDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNADNA DamageDNA RepairChromatinDNAchromatinchromatin dynamicsDNA damage response (DDR)double strand break (DSB)genome integrity

Identifiers

PMID35205260
PMCPMC8872016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.