Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35205243›Full record

ReviewGenes2022

DNA Repair in Space and Time: Safeguarding the Genome with the Cohesin Complex.

Jamie Phipps, Karine Dubrana

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Formation of chromosomal rearrangements inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Function and Evolution of the Loop Extrusion Machinery in Animals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jamie PhippsUMR Stabilité Génétique Cellules Souches et Radiations, INSERM, iRCM/IBFJ CEA, Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, F-92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Karine DubranaUMR Stabilité Génétique Cellules Souches et Radiations, INSERM, iRCM/IBFJ CEA, Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, F-92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1269-2564
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are a deleterious form of DNA damage, which must be robustly addressed to ensure genome stability. Defective repair can result in chromosome loss, point mutations, loss of heterozygosity or chromosomal rearrangements, which could lead to oncogenesis or cell death. We explore the requirements for the successful repair of DNA DSBs by non-homologous end joining and homology-directed repair (HDR) mechanisms in relation to genome folding and dynamics. On the occurrence of a DSB, local and global chromatin composition and dynamics, as well as 3D genome organization and break localization within the nuclear space, influence how repair proceeds. The cohesin complex is increasingly implicated as a key regulator of the genome, influencing chromatin composition and dynamics, and crucially genome organization through folding chromosomes by an active loop extrusion mechanism, and maintaining sister chromatid cohesion. Here, we consider how this complex is now emerging as a key player in the DNA damage response, influencing repair pathway choice and efficiency.

Indexed as

ChromosomesDNA RepairCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsDNACell Cycle ProteinsChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsDNAchromatinchromatin dynamicscohesinDNA repairhomologous recombinationNHEJnuclear organization

Identifiers

PMID35205243
PMCPMC8872453
OpenAlexW4206922488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.