ArticleBiology2022
Synthesis of Microscopic Cell Images Obtained from Bone Marrow Aspirate Smears through Generative Adversarial Networks.
Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Synthetic bone marrow images augment real samples in developing acute myeloid leukemia microscopy classification models.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Automated bone marrow cell classification through dual attention gates dense neural networks.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Every year approximately 1.24 million people are diagnosed with blood cancer. While the rate increases each year, the availability of data for each kind of blood cancer remains scarce. It is essential to produce enough data for each blood cell type obtained from bone marrow aspirate smears to diagnose rare types of cancer. Generating data would help easy and quick diagnosis, which are the most critical factors in cancer. Generative adversarial networks (GAN) are the latest emerging framework for generating synthetic images and time-series data. This paper takes microscopic cell images, preprocesses them, and uses a hybrid GAN architecture to generate synthetic images of the cell types containing fewer data. We prepared a single dataset with expert intervention by combining images from three different sources. The final dataset consists of 12 cell types and has 33,177 microscopic cell images. We use the discriminator architecture of auxiliary classifier GAN (AC-GAN) and combine it with the Wasserstein GAN with gradient penalty model (WGAN-GP). We name our model as WGAN-GP-AC. The discriminator in our proposed model works to identify real and generated images and classify every image with a cell type. We provide experimental results demonstrating that our proposed model performs better than existing individual and hybrid GAN models in generating microscopic cell images. We use the generated synthetic data with classification models, and the results prove that the classification rate increases significantly. Classification models achieved 0.95 precision and 0.96 recall value for synthetic data, which is higher than the original, augmented, or combined datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.