Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35204875›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Metagenomic and Metabolomic Profile of the Infantile Gut: Can They Be "Predicted" by the Feed Type?

Eftychia Ioanna Dimitrakopoulou, Abraham Pouliakis, Vasiliki Falaina, Theodoros Xanthos, Panagiotis Zoumpoulakis, Thalia Tsiaka, Rozeta Sokou, Zoi Iliodromiti, Theodora Boutsikou, Nicoletta Iacovidou

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The role of Micro-biome engineering in enhancing Food safety and quality.Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Review
  6. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Maternal stress during the third trimester of pregnancy and the neonatal microbiome.The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Eftychia Ioanna DimitrakopoulouDepartment of Neonatology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece.
Abraham Pouliakis2nd Department of Pathology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 124 62 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0074-3619
Vasiliki FalainaNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, General Hospital of Nikaia, Piraeus "Agios Panteleimon", 184 54 Piraeus, Greece.
Theodoros XanthosDepartment of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus.
Panagiotis ZoumpoulakisInstitute of Chemical Biology, National Hellenic Research Foundation, 116 35 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9348-6078
Thalia TsiakaInstitute of Chemical Biology, National Hellenic Research Foundation, 116 35 Athens, Greece.
Rozeta SokouDepartment of Neonatology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9972-8901
Zoi IliodromitiDepartment of Neonatology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4316-7305
Theodora BoutsikouDepartment of Neonatology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece.
Nicoletta IacovidouDepartment of Neonatology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity of West Attica · GREuropean University Cyprus · CYGeneral Hospital of Nikea · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe composition and the metabolic activity of the gut microbiota of breastfed and formula-fed infants has been the focus of several studies over the last two decades. Gene sequencing techniques and metabolomics in biological samples have led to expansion of our knowledge in this field. A more thorough comprehension of the metabolic role of the intestinal microbiota could assist and expedite the development of optimal feeding strategies. The aim of this systematic review is to present available data regarding the effect of the feed type on the infantile intestinal microbiota (microbial composition and metabolites) by DNA-sequencing and metabolome analysis of neonatal stool.

methodsA systematic search of the literature in PubMed was attempted to establish relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials studying the diversity and composition of gut microbiota and metabolites of infants that received different types of feed were included. The study subjects were infants/neonates born at term or preterm receiving either breast, donor, or formula milk. Formula could be either classic or fortified with probiotics, prebiotics, or both. The included trials compared the differences on metagenomics and metabolomics of infantile stool, aiming at investigating the beneficial effects of fortification of formula with synbiotics.

resultsOut of 1452 papers identified by the initial search, seven were selected for inclusion, following screening for eligibility. Eligibility was determined by closer examination for relevance of the title, abstract, and subsequent full text. The results of these studies mostly support that the feed type modulates the microbiome composition. In terms of the alpha-diversity, no significant difference exists between the feeding groups, whereas significant differences were noted with regards to beta-diversity in breastfed and formula-fed infants. As for the microbial composition, the studies revealed different populations in the formula-fed group compared to the breastfed group at the phylum and genus level. Bifidobacteria supplementation of infant formula did not seem to change the proportions of Bifidobacterial sequences during the first year of life. Another finding according to the studies is that the pH of fecal samples in breastfed as well as prebiotic-supplemented formula-fed infants. was significantly lower than that of formula-fed infants. Infant milk formula with a mixture of prebiotics (GOS/FOS oligosaccharides) was shown to be capable of selectively stimulating the growth of Bifidobacteria with analogous changes in fecal pH and short-chain fatty acid content in fully formula-fed infants.

conclusionsOverall, there is evidence to support that feed type modulates the infants' microbiome constitution. The impact of feeding on term and preterm microbiota could have potential benefits on intestinal functionality, immune system, and metabolism, and probably pursuing the host for life.

Indexed as

fecal microbiotafeed typegut chemistryinfantmetabolomicsmetagenomicsprebioticssupplemented formula

Identifiers

PMID35204875
PMCPMC8870590
OpenAlexW4210416113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.