Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35204638›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Automated Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Histology Images via Deep Learning.

Bum-Joo Cho, Jeong-Won Kim, Jungkap Park, Gui-Young Kwon, Mineui Hong, Si-Hyong Jang, Heejin Bang, Gilhyang Kim, Sung-Taek Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bum-Joo ChoMedical Artificial Intelligence Center, Hallym University Medical Center, Anyang 14068, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0244-388X
Jeong-Won KimDepartment of Pathology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul 07441, Korea.
Jungkap ParkMedical Artificial Intelligence Center, Hallym University Medical Center, Anyang 14068, Korea.
Gui-Young KwonSeoul Clinical Laboratories, Yongin 16954, Korea.
Mineui HongDepartment of Pathology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul 06973, Korea.
Si-Hyong JangDepartment of Pathology, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan 31151, Korea.
Heejin BangDepartment of Pathology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 05030, Korea.
Gilhyang KimDepartment of Pathology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul 07441, Korea.
Sung-Taek ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul 07441, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7841-4532

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2019R1G1A1011227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has enabled the automated diagnosis of several cancer types. We aimed to develop and validate deep learning models that automatically classify cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) based on histological images. Microscopic images of CIN3, CIN2, CIN1, and non-neoplasm were obtained. The performances of two pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) models adopting DenseNet-161 and EfficientNet-B7 architectures were evaluated and compared with those of pathologists. The dataset comprised 1106 images from 588 patients; images of 10% of patients were included in the test dataset. The mean accuracies for the four-class classification were 88.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.3-90.6%) by DenseNet-161 and 89.5% (95% CI, 83.3-95.7%) by EfficientNet-B7, which were similar to human performance (93.2% and 89.7%). The mean per-class area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values by EfficientNet-B7 were 0.996, 0.990, 0.971, and 0.956 in the non-neoplasm, CIN3, CIN1, and CIN2 groups, respectively. The class activation map detected the diagnostic area for CIN lesions. In the three-class classification of CIN2 and CIN3 as one group, the mean accuracies of DenseNet-161 and EfficientNet-B7 increased to 91.4% (95% CI, 88.8-94.0%), and 92.6% (95% CI, 90.4-94.9%), respectively. CNN-based deep learning is a promising tool for diagnosing CIN lesions on digital histological images.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecervical intraepithelial neoplasiaconvolutional neural networkdeep learninghistology image

Identifiers

PMID35204638
PMCPMC8871214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.