ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Automated Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Histology Images via Deep Learning.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reinforcement learning-based WSI diagnostic system for cervical squamous cell carcinoma and precancerous lesions.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- An optimized EfficientNetB7 deep learning model for lung cancer tissue pathology image recognition.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Digital Pathology with AI for Cervical Biopsies: Diagnostic Accuracy at the CIN2+ Threshold.Cancers · 2025Article
- Review
- A Review on the Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosing and Treating Cervical Cancer.International journal of women's health · 2025Review
- Looking Back, Moving Forward: Challenges and Opportunities for Global Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control.Viruses · 2024Review
- Deep Learning-Based Recognition of Cervical Squamous Interepithelial Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A CAD system for automatic dysplasia grading on H&E cervical whole-slide images.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Deep-learning models for image-based gynecological cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and meta- analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Deep Learning-Based Classification of Uterine Cervical and Endometrial Cancer Subtypes from Whole-Slide Histopathology Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Cervix Type and Cervical Cancer Classification System Using Deep Learning Techniques.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence has enabled the automated diagnosis of several cancer types. We aimed to develop and validate deep learning models that automatically classify cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) based on histological images. Microscopic images of CIN3, CIN2, CIN1, and non-neoplasm were obtained. The performances of two pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) models adopting DenseNet-161 and EfficientNet-B7 architectures were evaluated and compared with those of pathologists. The dataset comprised 1106 images from 588 patients; images of 10% of patients were included in the test dataset. The mean accuracies for the four-class classification were 88.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.3-90.6%) by DenseNet-161 and 89.5% (95% CI, 83.3-95.7%) by EfficientNet-B7, which were similar to human performance (93.2% and 89.7%). The mean per-class area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values by EfficientNet-B7 were 0.996, 0.990, 0.971, and 0.956 in the non-neoplasm, CIN3, CIN1, and CIN2 groups, respectively. The class activation map detected the diagnostic area for CIN lesions. In the three-class classification of CIN2 and CIN3 as one group, the mean accuracies of DenseNet-161 and EfficientNet-B7 increased to 91.4% (95% CI, 88.8-94.0%), and 92.6% (95% CI, 90.4-94.9%), respectively. CNN-based deep learning is a promising tool for diagnosing CIN lesions on digital histological images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.