ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Automated Structural Analysis and Quantitative Characterization of Scar Tissue Using Machine Learning.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of collagen band-associated regions in H&E-stained colonic biopsies of collagenous colitis patients using superpixel-based feature extraction and neural network classification.Diagnostic pathology · 2026Article
- A Mathematical Model of Wound Healing Incorporating Strain-Induced MSC Differentiation.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Robust myocardium detection and scar severity classification in LGE-CMR using ScarYOLO and contrastive learning.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Hypertrophic and Keloid Scar Management: Advances in Diagnosis, Perioperative Care, and Anesthetic Modulation.Cureus · 2025Review
- Advances in intelligent recognition and diagnosis of skin scar images: concepts, methods, challenges, and future trends.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Progress in the application of artificial intelligence in skin wound assessment and prediction of healing time.American journal of translational research · 2024Review
- Mapping variation of extracellular matrix in human keloid scar by label-free multiphoton imaging and machine learning.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An analysis of scar tissue is necessary to understand the pathological tissue conditions during or after the wound healing process. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining has conventionally been applied to understand the morphology of scar tissue. However, the scar lesions cannot be analyzed from a whole slide image. The current study aimed to develop a method for the rapid and automatic characterization of scar lesions in HE-stained scar tissues using a supervised and unsupervised learning algorithm. The supervised learning used a Mask region-based convolutional neural network (RCNN) to train a pattern from a data representation using MMDetection tools. The K-means algorithm characterized the HE-stained tissue and extracted the main features, such as the collagen density and directional variance of the collagen. The Mask RCNN model effectively predicted scar images using various backbone networks (e.g., ResNet50, ResNet101, ResNeSt50, and ResNeSt101) with high accuracy. The K-means clustering method successfully characterized the HE-stained tissue by separating the main features in terms of the collagen fiber and dermal mature components, namely, the glands, hair follicles, and nuclei. A quantitative analysis of the scar tissue in terms of the collagen density and directional variance of the collagen confirmed 50% differences between the normal and scar tissues. The proposed methods were utilized to characterize the pathological features of scar tissue for an objective histological analysis. The trained model is time-efficient when used for detection in place of a manual analysis. Machine learning-assisted analysis is expected to aid in understanding scar conditions, and to help establish an optimal treatment plan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.