Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35204611›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Quantum Iterative Reconstruction for Low-Dose Ultra-High-Resolution Photon-Counting Detector CT of the Lung.

Thomas Sartoretti, Damien Racine, Victor Mergen, Lisa Jungblut, Pascal Monnin, Thomas G Flohr, Katharina Martini, Thomas Frauenfelder, Hatem Alkadhi, André Euler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas SartorettiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4812-987X
Damien RacineInstitute of Radiation Physics (IRA), Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne (UNIL), CH-1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6596-0366
Victor MergenInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Lisa JungblutInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Pascal MonninInstitute of Radiation Physics (IRA), Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne (UNIL), CH-1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Thomas G FlohrSiemens Healthcare GmbH, 91052 Forchheim, Germany.
Katharina MartiniInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2638-6832
Thomas FrauenfelderInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3295-6619
Hatem AlkadhiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2581-2166
André EulerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5019-4585
University of Zurich · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CHSiemens Healthineers (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to characterize image quality and to determine the optimal strength levels of a novel iterative reconstruction algorithm (quantum iterative reconstruction, QIR) for low-dose, ultra-high-resolution (UHR) photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) of the lung. Images were acquired on a clinical dual-source PCD-CT in the UHR mode and reconstructed with a sharp lung reconstruction kernel at different strength levels of QIR (QIR-1 to QIR-4) and without QIR (QIR-off). Noise power spectrum (NPS) and target transfer function (TTF) were analyzed in a cylindrical phantom. 52 consecutive patients referred for low-dose UHR chest PCD-CT were included (CTDI

Indexed as

imaginglungphantomstomographyX-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID35204611
PMCPMC8871296
OpenAlexW4212969560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.