Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35204608›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Investigation of Eye-Tracking Scan Path as a Biomarker for Autism Screening Using Machine Learning Algorithms.

Mujeeb Rahman Kanhirakadavath, Monica Subashini Mohan Chandran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Artificial Intelligence Methods in Early Detection of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A DSM-5 Criterion-Based Systematic Review.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Machine learning algorithms for identifying autism spectrum disorder through eye-tracking in different intention videos].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mujeeb Rahman KanhirakadavathSchool of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4335-256X
Monica Subashini Mohan ChandranSchool of Electrical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3491-8728
Ajman University · AEVellore Institute of Technology University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder is a group of disorders marked by difficulties with social skills, repetitive activities, speech, and nonverbal communication. Deficits in paying attention to, and processing, social stimuli are common for children with autism spectrum disorders. It is uncertain whether eye-tracking technologies can assist in establishing an early biomarker of autism based on the children's atypical visual preference patterns. In this study, we used machine learning methods to test the applicability of eye-tracking data in children to aid in the early screening of autism. We looked into the effectiveness of various machine learning techniques to discover the best model for predicting autism using visualized eye-tracking scan path images. We adopted three traditional machine learning models and a deep neural network classifier to run experimental trials. This study employed a publicly available dataset of 547 graphical eye-tracking scan paths from 328 typically developing and 219 autistic children. We used image augmentation to populate the dataset to prevent the model from overfitting. The deep neural network model outperformed typical machine learning approaches on the populated dataset, with 97% AUC, 93.28% sensitivity, 91.38% specificity, 94.46% NPV, and 90.06% PPV (fivefold cross-validated). The findings strongly suggest that eye-tracking data help clinicians for a quick and reliable autism screening.

Indexed as

ASD screeningautism spectrum disorderconvolutional neural network (CNN)eye-tracking scan path imagesmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID35204608
PMCPMC8871384
OpenAlexW4212954389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.