ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Radiomics Analysis of [
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of radiomics and machine learning to thyroid diseases in nuclear medicine: a systematic review.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Beyond the Primary Tumor: Malignancy Risk and Evaluation Strategies forMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- Deciding on Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy in Thyroid Incidentalomas in FDG-PET/CT: Should Ultrasonographic Evaluation or FDG Uptake Be in the Foreground?Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2025Article
- The Interplay Between High Cumulative Doses of Radioactive Iodine and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Complex Cardiovascular Challenge.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Positron Emission Tomography Radiopharmaceuticals in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe performed a systematic review of the literature to provide an overview of the application of PET-based radiomics of [
methodsThe most relevant databases were explored using an algorithm constructed based on a combination of terms related to our subject and English-language articles published until October 2021 were considered. Among the 247 identified articles, 19 studies were screened for eligibility and 11 met the criteria, with 4 studies including radiomics analyses.
resultsWe summarized the available literature based on a study of PET volumetric parameters and radiomics. Ten articles provided accurate details about volumetric parameters and their prospective value in tumour assessment. We included the data provided by these articles in a sub-analysis, but could not obtain statistically relevant results. Four publications analyzed the diagnostic potential of radiomics and the possibility of creating precise predictive models, their corresponding quality score being assessed.
conclusionsThe use of PET volumetric parameters and radiomics analysis in patients with [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.