ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional pituitary adenoma imaging.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- Incidental Lung Lesions on the CT Component of Oncologic FDG PET/CT: A Pictorial Review of Interpretive Pitfalls and Diagnostic Clues.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Optimization of a Q.Clear PET image reconstruction based on bayesian optimization in oncology and neurology applications.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- Personalised Dosimetry in Nuclear Medicine: Bridging Physics, Biology and AI for Next Generation Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Review
- Low-count whole-body PET denoising with deep learning in a multicenter, multi-tracer and externally validated study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Modelling image quality over extended [Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Optimized reference region and the effect on test-retest reliability and detection of Parkinson's disease with [bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The Role of PET Image Quantification in Modern Radiation Therapy.PET clinics · 2025Review
- 18F-FDG PET/CT Findings to Improve Confidence in Distinguishing Lung External Beam Radiotherapy Side Effects.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for cutaneous melanoma staging: A scientific review.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- The potential of generative AI with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT: challenges and future directions.Medical review (2021) · 2025Review
- IRMA: Machine learning-based harmonization ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- The Role of [18F]FDG PET Imaging for the Assessment of Pulmonary Lymphangitic Carcinomatosis: A Comprehensive Narrative Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Impact of tissue-independent positron range correction on [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- New FDG-PET/CT interpretation criteria (Huaxi criteria) for response assessment in patients with nasal-type extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: development and validation.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Exploring a Nitric Oxide-Releasing Celecoxib Derivative as a Potential Modulator of Bone Healing: Insights from Ex Vivo and In Vivo Imaging Experiments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Feasibility of [Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Novel Quantification Protocol for Cardiovascular Calcification Progression Using Longitudinal MicroPET/MicroCT Images.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2024Article
- Influence of Covariates onDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various factors have been identified that influence quantitative accuracy and image interpretation in positron emission tomography (PET). Through the continuous introduction of new PET technology-both imaging hardware and reconstruction software-into clinical care, we now find ourselves in a transition period in which traditional and new technologies coexist. The effects on the clinical value of PET imaging and its interpretation in routine clinical practice require careful reevaluation. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of important factors influencing quantification and interpretation with a focus on recent developments in PET technology. Finally, we discuss the relationship between quantitative accuracy and subjective image interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.