Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35204496›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Predictive and Prognostic Significance of mRNA Expression and DNA Copies Aberrations of

Matvey M Tsyganov, Marina K Ibragimova, Evgeniy Yu Garbukov, Irina A Tsydenova, Kseniya A Gaptulbarova, Daria S Dolgasheva, Ekaterina A Zdereva, Anastasia A Frolova, Elena M Slonimskaya, Nikolai V Litviakov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matvey M TsyganovCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Marina K IbragimovaCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Evgeniy Yu GarbukovCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Irina A TsydenovaCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2716-3075
Kseniya A GaptulbarovaCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Daria S DolgashevaCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Ekaterina A ZderevaCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Anastasia A FrolovaCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Elena M SlonimskayaCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Nikolai V LitviakovCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0714-8927
Russian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 22-25-00499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasingly, many researchers are focusing on the sensitivity in breast tumors (BC) to certain chemotherapy drugs and have personalized their research based on the assessment of this sensitivity. One such personalized approach is to assess the chemotherapy's gene expression, as well as aberrations in the number of DNA copies-deletions and amplifications with the ability to have a significant effect on the gene's activity. Thus, the aim of this work was to study the predictive and prognostic significance of the expression and chromosomal aberrations of eight chemosensitivity genes in breast cancer patients. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe study involved 97 patients with luminal B breast cancer IIB-IIIB stages. DNA and RNA were isolated from samples of tumor tissue before and after treatment. Microarray analysis was performed for all samples on high-density microarrays (DNA chips) of Affymetrix (USA) CytoScanTM HD Array and Clariom™ S Assay, human. Detection of expression level of seven chemosensitivity genes-

resultsThe expression of the

conclusionThus, a complex assessment of the chemotherapy's gene expression is important not only for understanding the heterogeneity and molecular biology of breast cancer but also to obtain a more accurate disease prognosis.

Indexed as

chemotherapy’s gene expressioncopy number aberrationsefficiencyneoadjuvant chemotherapyprognosis

Identifiers

PMID35204496
PMCPMC8871321
OpenAlexW4210768421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.