Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35204442›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Intracranial Meningioma in Elderly Patients. Retrospective Multicentric Risk and Surgical Factors Study of Morbidity and Mortality.

Daniele Armocida, Umberto Aldo Arcidiacono, Mauro Palmieri, Alessandro Pesce, Fabio Cofano, Veronica Picotti, Maurizio Salvati, Giancarlo D'Andrea, Diego Garbossa, Antonio Santoro and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Daniele ArmocidaNeurosurgery Division, Human Neurosciences Department, "Sapienza" University, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6550-5534
Umberto Aldo ArcidiaconoNeurosurgery Division, Human Neurosciences Department, "Sapienza" University, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6715-5395
Mauro PalmieriNeurosurgery Division, Human Neurosciences Department, "Sapienza" University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Alessandro PesceSanta Maria Goretti Hospital, 04100 Latina, Italy.
Fabio CofanoNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.
Veronica PicottiNeurosurgery Department, Fabrizio Spaziani Hospital, 03100 Frosinone, Italy.
Maurizio SalvatiPoliclinico Tor Vergata, University Tor Vergata of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Giancarlo D'AndreaNeurosurgery Department, Fabrizio Spaziani Hospital, 03100 Frosinone, Italy.
Diego GarbossaNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.
Antonio SantoroNeurosurgery Division, Human Neurosciences Department, "Sapienza" University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Alessandro FratiNeurosurgery Division, Human Neurosciences Department, "Sapienza" University, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8062-614X
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Turin · ITIstituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITOspedale Santa Maria Goretti · ITPoliclinico Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing life expectancy, a large number of intracranial meningiomas (IM) have been identified in elderly patients. There is no general consensus regarding the management for IMs nor studies regarding the outcome of older patients undergoing meningioma surgery. We aimed to determine whether preoperative variables and postoperative clinical outcomes differ between age groups after meningioma surgery. We analyzed data from all patients who had undergone IM surgery from our departments. The final cohort consisted of 340 patients affected by IM with ASA class I-II: 188 in the young group (<65) and 152 in the elderly. The two subgroups did not present significant differences concerning biological characteristics of tumor, localization, diameters, lesion and edema volumes and surgical radicality. Despite these comparable data, elderly presented with a significantly lower Karnofsky Performance status value on admission and remained consistently lower during the follow-up. We establish instead that there is no intrinsic correlation to the presence of IM and no significant increased risk of complications or recurrence in elderly patients, but rather only an increased risk of reduced performance status with mortality related to the comorbidity of the patient, primarily cardiovascular disease, and an intrinsic frailty of the aged population.

Indexed as

brain tumorelderly patientmeningiomaneurosurgeryrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID35204442
PMCPMC8871449
OpenAlexW4210419964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.