Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35204401›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Surgical Site Cytology to Diagnose Spinal Lesions.

Leon-Gordian Koepke, Annika Heuer, Martin Stangenberg, Marc Dreimann, Lutz Welker, Carsten Bokemeyer, André Strahl, Anne Marie Asemissen, Lennart Viezens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leon-Gordian KoepkeDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3966-8537
Annika HeuerDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8341-9525
Martin StangenbergDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Marc DreimannDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1055-8695
Lutz WelkerInstitute of Pathology with the Sections Molecular Pathology and Cytopathology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Carsten BokemeyerDepartment of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald University Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6071-7810
André StrahlDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2385-9582
Anne Marie AsemissenDepartment of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald University Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Lennart ViezensDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with new-onset malignant spinal lesions often have an urgent need for local spine intervention and systemic therapy. For optimal management, it is crucial to diagnose the underlying disease as quickly and reliably as possible. The aim of our current study was to determine the feasibility, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic certainty of complementary cytological evaluation of spinal lesions suspected of malignancy. In 44 patients, we performed histopathological biopsies and in parallel cytologic preparations from the malignant site. Cytological smears were prepared and stained for May-Grunwald and Giemsa. Bone biopsies were histopathologically analyzed according to the existing standard-of-care practices. In 42 of 44 cases (95%), a cytological sample was successfully obtained. In 40 cases (95.2%, Cohen's kappa: 0.77), the cytological diagnosis agreed with the histological diagnosis regarding the identification of a malignant lesion. This resulted in a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 80% as well as a diagnostic safety of 95%. Cytological analysis in the context of spinal surgery proved sufficient to establish a diagnosis of malignancy or its exclusion, expanding the existing diagnostic spectrum. Furthermore, implementation of this process as a routine clinical diagnostic might shorten the time to diagnosis and improve the treatment of this vulnerable patient group.

Indexed as

biopsybone marrowcytological techniquemetastasesspinal neoplasmsspinestandard of care

Identifiers

PMID35204401
PMCPMC8871040
OpenAlexW4210299284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.