ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence Performance in Image-Based Cancer Identification: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of AI-assisted endoscopy diagnosis of digestive system tumors: an umbrella review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- The Performance of Wearable AI in Detecting Stress Among Students: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic value of deep learning-assisted endoscopic ultrasound for pancreatic tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Letter to the Editor: Reconsidering relevance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation in pancreatic cancer treatment: Future perspectives on artificial intelligence.World journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Lymph Node Detection and Malignancy Prediction in Endoscopic Ultrasound: A Multicenter Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Tools Across the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgical Pathway: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopy in Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Tumors: A Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.Gastro hep advances · 2025Review
- Deep learning-based prediction of nodal metastasis in lung cancer using endobronchial ultrasound.JTCVS techniques · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) of the Luminal Gastrointestinal Tract.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A Comprehensive Guide to Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopic Ultrasound.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Cancer Control: Toward Prioritizing Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (JEDI) in Emerging Decision Support Technologies.Current oncology reports · 2023Review
- Artificial Intelligence for the Prediction and Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence as a noninvasive tool for pancreatic cancer prediction and diagnosis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Artificial Intelligence-The Rising Star in the Field of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We performed a meta-analysis of published data to investigate the diagnostic value of artificial intelligence for pancreatic cancer. Systematic research was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies up to October 2021. We extracted or calculated the number of true positives, false positives true negatives, and false negatives from the selected publications. In total, 10 studies, featuring 1871 patients, met our inclusion criteria. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. R and RevMan 5.4.1 software were used for calculations and statistical analysis. The studies included in the meta-analysis did not show an overall heterogeneity (I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.