ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Classification of the Confocal Microscopy Images of Colorectal Tumor and Inflammatory Colitis Mucosa Tissue Using Deep Learning.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel convolutional neural network for bacterial identification of confocal microscopic datasets.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Confocal microscopy image analysis is a useful method for neoplasm diagnosis. Many ambiguous cases are difficult to distinguish with the naked eye, thus leading to high inter-observer variability and significant time investments for learning this method. We aimed to develop a deep learning-based neoplasm classification model that classifies confocal microscopy images of 10× magnified colon tissues into three classes: neoplasm, inflammation, and normal tissue. ResNet50 with data augmentation and transfer learning approaches was used to efficiently train the model with limited training data. A class activation map was generated by using global average pooling to confirm which areas had a major effect on the classification. The proposed method achieved an accuracy of 81%, which was 14.05% more accurate than three machine learning-based methods and 22.6% better than the predictions made by four endoscopists. ResNet50 with data augmentation and transfer learning can be utilized to effectively identify neoplasm, inflammation, and normal tissue in confocal microscopy images. The proposed method outperformed three machine learning-based methods and identified the area that had a major influence on the results. Inter-observer variability and the time required for learning can be reduced if the proposed model is used with confocal microscopy image analysis for diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.