Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35204368›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

One-Day Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Digital Pathology by Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy.

Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Oscar Selvaggio, Francesca Sanguedolce, Paola Milillo, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Salvatore Mariano Bruno, Marco Recchia, Carlo Bettocchi, Gian Maria Busetto, Luca Macarini and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ugo Giovanni FalagarioDepartment of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Oscar SelvaggioDepartment of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Francesca SanguedolceDepartment of Pathology, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Paola MililloDepartment of Radiology, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Maria Chiara SighinolfiDepartment of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20142 Milano, Italy.
Salvatore Mariano BrunoDepartment of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Marco RecchiaDepartment of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Carlo BettocchiDepartment of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Gian Maria BusettoDepartment of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7291-0316
Luca MacariniDepartment of Radiology, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Bernardo RoccoDepartment of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20142 Milano, Italy.
Luigi CormioDepartment of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Giuseppe CarrieriDepartment of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
University of Foggia · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this prospective observational study, we tested the feasibility and efficacy of a novel one-day PCa diagnosis path based on biparametric magnetic resonance (bpMRI) and digital pathology by fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM). Patients aged 55-70 years scheduled for PBx due to increased PSA levels (3-10 ng/mL) and/or abnormal digitorectal examination were enrolled. All patients underwent bpMRI and PBx with immediate FCM evaluation of biopsy cores. Patients were asked to fill out a dedicated Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. Patients' satisfaction rates and concordance between digital pathology and standard HE evaluation were the outcomes of interest. Twelve patients completed our one-day PCa diagnosis path. BpMRI showed suspicious lesions in 7 patients. Digital pathology by FCM identified PCa in 5 (41.7%) of the 12 patients. Standard pathology confirmed the diagnosis made through digital pathology in all the cases. At a per patient level, high concordance between the methods was achieved in Gleason Grading (4 out of 5 patients). The level of agreement in the number of positive cores was lower but did not affect the choice of treatment in any of the 5 PCa cases. At a per core level, the agreement was very high for the diagnosis of anyPCa (96.2%) and csPCa (97.3%), with a k coefficient of 0.90 and 0.92, respectively (near perfect agreement). In conclusion, one-day PCa diagnosis by FCM represents a feasible, reliable, and fast diagnostic method that provides significant advantages in optimizing time and resources, leading to patients having a higher quality standard of care perception.

Indexed as

biparametric magnetic resonance imagingdigital pathologyfluorescence confocal microscopyprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID35204368
PMCPMC8871204
OpenAlexW4205961777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.