Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35204327›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Clinically Relevant Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Umbilical Cord Pathology.

Roxana Elena Bohîlțea, Vlad Dima, Ioniță Ducu, Ana Maria Iordache, Bianca Margareta Mihai, Octavian Munteanu, Corina Grigoriu, Alina Veduță, Dimitrie Pelinescu-Onciul, Radu Vlădăreanu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Association of placental and umbilical cord characteristics with cerebral palsy: national cohort study.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Roxana Elena BohîlțeaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 37 Dionisie Lupu, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6381-7419
Vlad DimaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology, Filantropia Hospital, 11-13 Ion Mihalache Blv., Sector 1, 011171 Bucharest, Romania.
Ioniță DucuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Emergency Hospital, 169 Splaiul Independentei Bld., Sector 5, 050098 Bucharest, Romania.
Ana Maria IordacheOptospintronics Department, National Institute for Research and Development in Optoelectronics-INOE 2000, 409 Atomistilor, 077125 Magurele, Romania.
Bianca Margareta MihaiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology, Filantropia Hospital, 11-13 Ion Mihalache Blv., Sector 1, 011171 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-8957-737X
Octavian MunteanuDepartment of Anatomy, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 37 Dionisie Lupu, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Corina GrigoriuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 37 Dionisie Lupu, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Alina VeduțăDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology, Filantropia Hospital, 11-13 Ion Mihalache Blv., Sector 1, 011171 Bucharest, Romania.
Dimitrie Pelinescu-OnciulDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 37 Dionisie Lupu, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Radu VlădăreanuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 37 Dionisie Lupu, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9512-2673
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROClinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · RONational Institute of Research and Development for Optoelectronics · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Umbilical cord abnormalities are not rare, and are often associated with structural or chromosomal abnormalities, fetal intrauterine growth restriction, and poor pregnancy outcomes; the latter can be a result of prematurity, placentation deficiency or, implicitly, an increased index of cesarean delivery due to the presence of fetal distress, higher admission to neonatal intensive care, and increased prenatal mortality rates. Even if the incidence of velamentous insertion, vasa praevia and umbilical knots is low, these pathologies increase the fetal morbidity and mortality prenatally and intrapartum. There is a vast heterogeneity among societies' guidelines regarding the umbilical cord examination. We consider the mandatory introduction of placental cord insertion examination in the first and second trimester to practice guidelines for fetal ultrasound scans. Moreover, during the mid-trimester scan, we recommend a transvaginal ultrasound and color Doppler assessment of the internal cervical os for low-lying placentas, marginal or velamentous cord insertion, and the evaluation of umbilical cord entanglement between the insertion sites whenever it is incidentally found. Based on the pathological description and the neonatal outcome reported for each entity, we conclude our descriptive review by establishing a new, clinically relevant classification of these umbilical cord anomalies.

Indexed as

3D imagingcolor Dopplerprenatal diagnosissecond trimester screeningultrasoundumbilical cordumbilical knotvasa praeviavelamentous cord insertion

Identifiers

PMID35204327
PMCPMC8871173
OpenAlexW4206461597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.