Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35204053›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Visual Neglect after PICA Stroke-A Case Study.

Nora Geiser, Brigitte Charlotte Kaufmann, Henrik Rühe, Noortje Maaijwee, Tobias Nef, Dario Cazzoli, Thomas Nyffeler

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nora GeiserNeurocenter, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9216-1666
Brigitte Charlotte KaufmannNeurocenter, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0766-8068
Henrik RüheNeurocenter, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland.
Noortje MaaijweeNeurocenter, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland.
Tobias NefARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, 3008 Bern, Switzerland.
Dario CazzoliNeurocenter, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland.
Thomas NyffelerNeurocenter, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2504-8935
University of Bern · CHLuzerner Kantonsspital · CH

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 32003B_196915Swiss National Science Foundation P2BEP3_195283Swiss National Science Foundation Z00P3_154714/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After cerebellar stroke, cognition can be impaired, as described within the framework of the so-called Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome (CCAS). However, it remains unclear whether visual neglect can also be part of CCAS. We describe the case of a patient with a subacute cerebellar stroke after thrombosis of the left posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA), who showed a left-sided visual neglect, indicating that the cerebellum also has a modulatory function on visual attention. The neglect, however, was mild and only detectable when using the sensitive neuro-psychological Five-Point Test as well as video-oculography assessment, yet remained unnoticed when evaluated with common neglect-specific paper-pencil tests. Three weeks later, follow-up assessments revealed an amelioration of neglect symptoms. Therefore, these findings suggest that visual neglect may be a part of CCAS, but that the choice of neglect assessments and the time delay since stroke onset may be crucial. Although the exact underlying pathophysiological mechanisms remain unclear, we propose cerebellar-cerebral diaschisis as a possible explanation of why neglect can occur on the ipsilateral side. Further research applying sensitive assessment tools at different post-stroke stages is needed to investigate the incidence, lesion correlates, and pathophysiology of neglect after cerebellar lesions.

Indexed as

free visual explorationneglectPICAstrokevideo-oculography

Identifiers

PMID35204053
PMCPMC8869876
OpenAlexW4212843038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.